04-11-2024
Laser_Taco_
Fluorite | Level 6
Member since
11-15-2023
- 8 Posts
- 4 Likes Given
- 2 Solutions
- 0 Likes Received
-
Latest posts by Laser_Taco_
Subject Views Posted 888 11-22-2023 04:35 PM 2160 11-22-2023 03:41 PM 2179 11-22-2023 02:45 PM 3110 11-20-2023 04:18 PM 3236 11-17-2023 11:03 AM 3278 11-16-2023 07:31 PM 3334 11-15-2023 04:35 PM 3389 11-15-2023 12:01 PM -
Activity Feed for Laser_Taco_
- Posted Re: Confidence interval for the regression fit on Statistical Procedures. 11-22-2023 04:35 PM
- Liked Re: Interpreting cubic vs. quadratic model fit and p values. for mthorne. 11-22-2023 04:13 PM
- Posted Re: Interpreting cubic vs. quadratic model fit and p values. on Statistical Procedures. 11-22-2023 03:41 PM
- Posted Re: Interpreting cubic vs. quadratic model fit and p values. on Statistical Procedures. 11-22-2023 02:45 PM
- Liked Re: Proc mixed, defining data structure for desired comparison (Random effect and subject) for SteveDenham. 11-21-2023 12:42 PM
- Posted Re: Proc mixed, defining data structure for desired comparison (Random effect and subject) on Statistical Procedures. 11-20-2023 04:18 PM
- Liked Re: Proc mixed, defining data structure for desired comparison (Random effect and subject) for SteveDenham. 11-17-2023 06:57 PM
- Posted Re: Proc mixed, defining data structure for desired comparison (Random effect and subject) on Statistical Procedures. 11-17-2023 11:03 AM
- Posted Re: Proc mixed, defining data structure for desired comparison (Random effect and subject) on Statistical Procedures. 11-16-2023 07:31 PM
- Liked Re: Proc mixed, defining data structure for desired comparison (Random effect and subject) for jiltao. 11-15-2023 04:46 PM
- Posted Re: Proc mixed, defining data structure for desired comparison (Random effect and subject) on Statistical Procedures. 11-15-2023 04:35 PM
- Posted Proc mixed, defining data structure for desired comparison (Random effect and subject) on Statistical Procedures. 11-15-2023 12:01 PM
-
Posts I Liked
Subject Likes Author Latest Post 1 1 1 1
11-23-2023
07:34 AM
Thank you very much for the help.
... View more
11-22-2023
04:11 PM
1 Like
Thank you, Kyle! That makes good sense. Mark
... View more
11-21-2023
08:46 AM
1 Like
Rather than a ratio of each component to the total you might consider a ratio of consumption of the feed with the larger feed level to the smaller feed level for each pen. You get a single value that is indexed by the variable 'Treatment'. Or consider the difference in consumption calculated in much the same way. That might even be better as it is much more likely to collectively have residuals that are distributed normally. The lsmeans by treatment are then a measure of how much more was consumed of the higher valued feed - which is a clear measure of preference.
SteveDenham
... View more