Doesn't look like anything is wrong. Don't unerstand why you're showing for RESTORING K not being 627. What's posted looks like an excerpt from a much larger program, perhaps the culprit is elsewhere and got edited out. By the way, display format, like 10.5, have nothing to do with internal precision. 1 DATA TEST; 2 HMWID = 62.7; 3 LIN_FT = 1; 4 RUN; NOTE: The data set WORK.TEST has 1 observations and 2 variables. NOTE: DATA statement used (Total process time): real time 0.01 seconds cpu time 0.01 seconds 5 6 DATA AVAL (KEEP = K FT); 7 ARRAY LAR{240:799} _TEMPORARY_; 8 SET TEST END=END; 9 PUTLOG HMWID=10.5 +3 HMWID=HEX16.; 10 11 HMWID = HMWID * 10; 12 PUTLOG 'STORING VALUE ' HMWID=10.5 +3 HMWID=HEX16.; 13 LAR{HMWID} + LIN_FT; 14 15 IF END; 16 17 DO J = 240 TO (799-40); 18 K = J; 19 FT = LAR{J}; 20 IF FT THEN DO; 21 OUTPUT AVAL; 22 PUTLOG 'RESTORING VALUE ' K=10.5 +3 HMWID=HEX16.; 23 END; 24 END; 25 RUN; HMWID=62.70000 HMWID=404F59999999999A STORING VALUE HMWID=627.00000 HMWID=4083980000000000 RESTORING VALUE K=627.00000 HMWID=4083980000000000 NOTE: There were 1 observations read from the data set WORK.TEST. NOTE: The data set WORK.AVAL has 1 observations and 2 variables. NOTE: DATA statement used (Total process time): real time 0.03 seconds cpu time 0.01 seconds
... View more
