I have two models in NLMIXED (one linear-broken line and the other a quadratic broken-line) and they have the exactly same AIC, BIC and variance components. Their AIC, BIC are smaller than other models I am comparing them to. I am using this models to estimate nutritional requirements of animals. Now, I am normally reporting only the estimated requirement of the best fitting model. In this case, should I report both of them? Or there is any further analysis/investigation can be done to find which one is better?
Thank you,
Marcio
I would expect the quadratic to be more easily explainable in biological terms (at least if it is quadratic to a plateau). Otherwise, linear is simpler to explain--there is an additive response above a certain cut-off.
Steve Denham
Hi,
One approach is focusing on the "Story Telling" side of your model.
Best,
Mohammad
I would expect the quadratic to be more easily explainable in biological terms (at least if it is quadratic to a plateau). Otherwise, linear is simpler to explain--there is an additive response above a certain cut-off.
Steve Denham
It's finally time to hack! Remember to visit the SAS Hacker's Hub regularly for news and updates.
ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.
Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.