- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I have a set of data of 52 weeks of actual output and demand. In order to prove their significant difference level, can anyone please show me the step in proving the sign. level?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
proc ttest for bi-variable normal distribution data.
proc npar1way for any distribution data.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
If I use chi square test to prove if there is any association between 2 variables? Is that ok?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The chi-square statistic is 12.9102. The P-Value is 0.004835. The result is significant at p < 0.05.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
That means they are associated . But you should know chi-square test is for frequency analysis. and If I don't get wrong your contingency table have lots of cells which freq less than 5 ,i.e. you should use Fisher exactly test.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
thanks for correcting me. I wil use the approach u mentioned and give you the answer asap... thanks for the guide~
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You should know what goal you are trying to retrieve . after that , choose the right statistical method .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
for the fisher exact test, the test is only for 2x2 table?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
no. you just need EXACT fisher statement to require this test.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The results of an exact contingency table test performed at 19:07 on 8-NOV-2014
data: contingency table A B C D 1 10 19 17 6 52 2 1 16 18 17 52 11 35 35 23 104 expected: contingency table A B C D 1 5.50 17.5 17.5 11.5 2 5.50 17.5 17.5 11.5
You have no "small" cells in the expected table...Use X2!
The given table has probability 1.3E-05
The sum of the probabilities of "unusual" tables, p = 0.004
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
The results of an exact contingency table test performed at 19:07 on 8-NOV-2014
data: contingency table A B C D 1 10 19 17 6 52
2 1 16 18 17 52
11 35 35 23 104
expected: contingency table A B C D
1 5.50 17.5 17.5 11.5
2 5.50 17.5 17.5 11.5
You have no "small" cells in the expected table...Use X2!
The given table has probability 1.3E-05
The sum of the probabilities of "unusual" tables, p = 0.004
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
Curious. Is your contingency table one-way or two-way ?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
http://www.quantitativeskills.com/sisa/dataprocs/table2xn.php?ts=52&inp=i m using this to help in my calculation...
btw, can I use mann-whitney test in proving the significant different?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
You misunderstand the contingency . You should firstly know what is row variable,what is column variable.
follow your mind, WEEK is row variable?
about mann-whitney test, if I am right it is almost like what I suggest proc npar1way + wilcoxon before .
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content
I had some difficulty in surfing internet now to get sufficient info on 7understanding the contingency.... can u kindly explain to me how to differentiate the row n column variable in this case ?