May you please help me understand how UN(1) and UN differ? I looked at the book "SAS for Mixed Models, 2nd Edition, by R. Littell et al. (SAS Press)" but still I do not see the difference.
Thanks
Look at the table of covariance structures in the PROC MIXED documentation.
It tells you that UN is an unstructured (t x t) matrix, which (b/c of symmetry) has t(t+1)/ parameters.
In contrast, UN(q) is a banded structure that is zero except for cells (i,j) such that |i-j|<q. When q=1, that means UN(1) is diagonal. It has t parameters.
Look at the table of covariance structures in the PROC MIXED documentation.
It tells you that UN is an unstructured (t x t) matrix, which (b/c of symmetry) has t(t+1)/ parameters.
In contrast, UN(q) is a banded structure that is zero except for cells (i,j) such that |i-j|<q. When q=1, that means UN(1) is diagonal. It has t parameters.
Thank you, Rick_SAS!
Is t the number of times we measured the outcome variable? And for TYPE=UN we have t(t-1) parameters because of symmetry?
Thanks!
Yes. For a balanced design, t is the number of times you measure the outcome for each subject.
@Emma_at_SAS wrote:
(...) And for TYPE=UN we have t(t-1) parameters because of symmetry?
The number of parameters in this case is t(t+1)/2, i.e., t variances on the diagonal of the covariance matrix plus t(t-1)/2 covariances below (and, due to symmetry, the same above) the diagonal. (The "2" in the denominator is somehow not displayed in @Rick_SAS's reply.)
Thank you, Rick_SAS and FreelanceReinhard.
Build your skills. Make connections. Enjoy creative freedom. Maybe change the world. Registration is now open through August 30th. Visit the SAS Hackathon homepage.
Register today!ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.
Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.