Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Home
- /
- Analytics
- /
- Stat Procs
- /
- Re: Interpreting the Estimated G Matrix in Proc Mixed

Options

- RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

🔒 This topic is **solved** and **locked**.
Need further help from the community? Please
sign in and ask a **new** question.

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted 03-11-2022 07:43 AM
(1576 views)

I have run this code in Proc Mixed for repeated measurements on subjects=Flask:

proc mixed data=FRF method=reml cl ic covtest;

class CCI4 CHCI3 Time Flask ;

model Leakage=CCI4 Time CCI4*Time ;

random CHCI3 CCI4*CHCI3 CHCI3*Time CCI4*CHCI3*Time /s;

repeated / subject=Flask(CCI4*CHCI3) type=arh(1) r;

lsmeans CCI4 / pdiff cl adjust=tukey;

run;

And part of the output shows the G Matrix below. How do we interpret the ARH(1) subject effect Flask(CCI4*CHCHI3) and its Estimate 0.9730?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

What you are asking for might not be applicable for a complex covariance model like yours.

Jill

9 REPLIES 9

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

I think I figured it out. Does it mean "Based on the off-diagonals, we estimate a covariance of 0.9730 between two measurements on the same Flask, regardless of time lapsed?"

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

0.9730 in the Covariance Parameter Estimates table is not an element in the G matrix. It is a parameter in the R matrix. It is the correlation in the residuals between two adjacent observations. See the documentation below for more information on the ARH(1) structure. The estimated value for rho is 0.9730.

Also, your G matrix is not positive definite. You might want to take out some of the random effects in your RANDOM statement.

Hope this helps,

Jill

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi @jiltao - removing the random effects when there is a non-positive G matrix seems to me to be a problem for randomized complete block designs, where the block estimate is zero. Removal shifts the denominator degrees of freedom from containment to residual, so the analysis no longer reflects the blocking in the design. Is the answer then to use a ddf= option to set the denominator degrees of freedom to what would be expected for the design?

SteveDenham

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Actually, as far as I know, there is no consensus on what to do when the G matrix is not positive definite. While some advice removing the "offending" random effects, others argue the modeling of the random effects is dictated by the design (like a RCB design), and therefore should not change the model effect specifications. If there is only one random effect with 0 estimated variance, one approach is to re-specify that random effect with the statement -- repeated / subject=<random_effect> type=cs;

If the default ddf value becomes inappropriate when a random effect is removed, then you might use ddf= option to specify your own denominator degrees of freedom value, or use other estimation method such as ddfm=kr if that helps.

Jill

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

@jiltao @SteveDenham Thank you for the insights, I am following. However, based on the posted G and R matrices, I have further questions:

1. How do I calculate the percentage contribution of each estimated variance component?

2. How do we get the overall error variance when heterogeneous error variance for each subject is displayed?

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

What you are asking for might not be applicable for a complex covariance model like yours.

Jill

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi Colleagues. I got a question from someone who saw my SAS Proc Mixed code that I used to fit a linear mixed model in SAS Studio (SAS on Demand). They asked me: "In what software environment is the procedure implemented?" I am confused with this environment term. How do I answer that one?

Build your skills. Make connections. Enjoy creative freedom. Maybe change the world. **Registration is now open through August 30th**. Visit the SAS Hackathon homepage.

What is ANOVA?

ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.