Hello,
I've been caught up in an issue in Proc Glimmix. For the same data, the same model and the same procedure, but I get different covatiance parameter estimate tables.
The treatment has 3 levels.
The model is :
proc glimmix data=analysis initglm method=laplace;
class trial rep treatment;
model event/group_total=treatment;
nloptions tech=newrap maxit=400;
random trial rep(trial);
run;
Covariance parameter estimates
Cov Parm Estimate Standard error
| trial | 0 | . |
|---|---|---|
| rep(trial) | 0.3120 | . |
Type III Test of Fixed effect
effect Num DF Den DF F value
| treatment | 2 | 24 | 53.62 | <.0001 |
|---|
However,if I sort the data by treatment first and re-run the glimmix procedure, I have different above tables:
Covariance parameter estimates
Cov Parm Estimate Standard error
| trial | 0 | 0.2204 |
|---|---|---|
| rep(trial) | 0.3109 | 0.4130 |
Type III Test of Fixed effect
effect Num DF Den DF F value
| treatment | 1 | 24 | 162.42 | <.0001 |
|---|
The df for numerator is 1. But the treatment has 3 levels, df should be 2.
Can anybody explain what causes these different results? Is it because the model is over-specified? Thanks a lot!
Get a ticket opened with Tech Support right away. Without access to your data, I can't really say what is going on, but that dropping of the treatment df makes me wonder if something has gone awry with the sorting, so check the log for that. Also check the stuff that GLIMMIX reports early on, such as number of observations, number of columns in the X and Z matrices, etc.
I admit, something really odd is happening.
Steve Denham
Nearly 200 sessions are now available on demand with the SAS Innovate Digital Pass.
Explore Now →ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.
Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.