BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
sasuser1000
Calcite | Level 5

 

I am using a logistic regression and my biggest problem is the very low correlations between the dependent and independents. The highest correlation with the dependent variable is a spend variable with a boxcox transformation and yield only a correlation of 0.2.

The results of my model are not very impressive and this, I beleive, it is related to the fact that all of the variables have a correlation lower or equal to 0.2 with the dependent,

the area under the curve is 0.684 and the classification table is below. on final note, I did try different transformations on all independents and interactions as well.

Did someone had a similar experience?

3 REPLIES 3
PaigeMiller
Diamond | Level 26

I can't recall if this ever happened to me, but low correlations usually mean poor model fit

--
Paige Miller
sasuser1000
Calcite | Level 5

After my posting, I have added a new variable from the database to my list of predictors and the distribution was bimodal which led me to think that my sample is including two different kind of population, i have corrected this and correlations are now fine

SteveDenham
Jade | Level 19

This is a super good example of how important data visualization is to good analysis.

Steve Denham

SAS Innovate 2025: Call for Content

Are you ready for the spotlight? We're accepting content ideas for SAS Innovate 2025 to be held May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. The call is open until September 16. Read more here about why you should contribute and what is in it for you!

Submit your idea!

How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 3 replies
  • 611 views
  • 0 likes
  • 3 in conversation