BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
stan
Quartz | Level 8

Folks:

here are the examples:

RANDOM <my_variable1> / RESIDUAL SUBJECT = <my_variable2>;

and

RANDOM _RESIDUAL_ / SUBJECT = <my_variable2>;

Thank you.

2 REPLIES 2
SteveDenham
Jade | Level 19

The former syntax specifies an R side covariance structure for <my_variable1>, while the latter syntax models an overdispersion.  I believe that since the default type is TYPE=VC, the two statements as they currently stand should yield the same results.  If not, please post, as this is a potentially interesting event.

Steve Denham

stan
Quartz | Level 8

Steve, at first glance the outputs are the same. I also met another explanation by @lvm:

If you do not have missing values for trial (i.e., same trials for each subject), you can use:

RANDOM _RESIDUAL_ / SUBJECT=SUB TYPE=CS;

Probably this is the same you mention.

hackathon24-white-horiz.png

The 2025 SAS Hackathon has begun!

It's finally time to hack! Remember to visit the SAS Hacker's Hub regularly for news and updates.

Latest Updates

What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 1637 views
  • 3 likes
  • 2 in conversation