BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
einstein
Quartz | Level 8

I have a macro that reads through a list of states and years, however, I'm wondering if there's a more efficient way to read through the states instead of only using a macro.

 

Here is my code:

 

%macro test (st=,year=);

proc freq data=data.out_&st._&year.;
tables place;
run;
%mend test;
%test (st=NY, year=2011);
%test (st=NY, year=2012);
%test (st=NY, year=2013);
%test (st=VA, year=2011);

etc.

Is there an easier, more consise way to run through the years without having to have three lines for NY for each year?  Should I use an array?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Quentin
Super User

Is the list of years the same for every state?  If so, then it should be straight forward to add some %DO loops in your macro.

 

So instead of calling it once for each freq, you could call it like:

%test (st=NY VA RI, startyear=2011, stopyear=2013)

 

That doesn't change the execution efficiency, but it does make it easier to generate the set of PROC FREQ steps without writing each macro call yourself.

 

Another option would be to have a dataset that has one record per freq table you want, with variables State and Year.  Then you can use that dataset to drive your macro.  For example, using CALL EXECUTE to read a record from the dataset and generate a macro call.

 

Even if there are millions of records, I'd still consider putting them all together and indexing the dataset.

The Boston Area SAS Users Group is hosting free webinars!
Next webinar will be in January 2025. Until then, check out our archives: https://www.basug.org/videos. And be sure to subscribe to our our email list.

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4
Reeza
Super User

Why is your data split like that in the first place?

Perhaps combining them from the start would help.

 

Unless your datasets are in the millions of rows each or possibly tens, there isn't a need to separate the data like that.

einstein
Quartz | Level 8

Yep, these datasets have millions of observations, which is why they're split by state and year.

Quentin
Super User

Is the list of years the same for every state?  If so, then it should be straight forward to add some %DO loops in your macro.

 

So instead of calling it once for each freq, you could call it like:

%test (st=NY VA RI, startyear=2011, stopyear=2013)

 

That doesn't change the execution efficiency, but it does make it easier to generate the set of PROC FREQ steps without writing each macro call yourself.

 

Another option would be to have a dataset that has one record per freq table you want, with variables State and Year.  Then you can use that dataset to drive your macro.  For example, using CALL EXECUTE to read a record from the dataset and generate a macro call.

 

Even if there are millions of records, I'd still consider putting them all together and indexing the dataset.

The Boston Area SAS Users Group is hosting free webinars!
Next webinar will be in January 2025. Until then, check out our archives: https://www.basug.org/videos. And be sure to subscribe to our our email list.
einstein
Quartz | Level 8
Thank you! This worked perfectly!

SAS Innovate 2025: Register Now

Registration is now open for SAS Innovate 2025 , our biggest and most exciting global event of the year! Join us in Orlando, FL, May 6-9.
Sign up by Dec. 31 to get the 2024 rate of just $495.
Register now!

What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 4 replies
  • 1038 views
  • 0 likes
  • 3 in conversation