BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
TomHsiung
Quartz | Level 8

Hello, everyone

 

Today I read this research paper "Plozasiran (ARO-APOC3) for Severe Hypertriglyceridemia
The SHASTA-2 Randomized Clinical Trial" (doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0959).

 

I am very interested in the line of Figure 2. According to my understanding, the model used in this research probably is a linear mixed model, and follow-up time is an independent factor. What I am not sure is how the author estimated the confidence interval of the outcomes in Figure 2? Using the linear mixed model? Or other methods?

 

Please let me know your ideas. Thank you.

 

Figure 2

Figure 2Figure 2

1 REPLY 1
Ksharp
Super User

Check @Rick_SAS blogs:

https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2016/06/22/sas-effectplot-statement.html

 

data have;
call streaminit(123);
do subject=1 to 100;
 do time=1 to 10;
   sex=ifc(rand('bern',0.4),'F','M');
   weight=rand('normal',4,100);
   height=rand('normal',0,2);
   output;
 end;
end;
run;

proc mixed data=have;
class  subject sex time;
model weight=height sex time/s;
random int/subject=subject;
repeated time/subject=subject ;
store out=mixedmodel;
run;
proc plm source=mixedmodel;
   effectplot INTERACTION(x=time  sliceby=sex /*plotby=CigsPerDay*/ )/limits connect;
run;

Ksharp_0-1720928968274.png

 

Ready to join fellow brilliant minds for the SAS Hackathon?

Build your skills. Make connections. Enjoy creative freedom. Maybe change the world. Registration is now open through August 30th. Visit the SAS Hackathon homepage.

Register today!
What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 1 reply
  • 63 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation