BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
sarah123
Obsidian | Level 7

Hi all, I'm trying to create a d-optimal main effects design with quantitative variables (e.g. price) that have 3+ levels. In my candidate runs, I observe runs with the intermediate levels of the quantitative variables, however, in all the output for my test designs, I have not seen any runs with intermediate levels of the quantitative variables. Only the largest and the smallest values of those variables.

 

Has anyone encountered this before, and is there a reason that the d-optimal designs are not selecting runs with the intermediate levels?

 

Thank you for any advice.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
WarrenKuhfeld
Ammonite | Level 13

Yes.  That is correct.  Two points define a line.  If you want a linear (quantitative) effect, then the correct behavior is to pick the extreme points.  That is most efficient.  If you want intermediate points (the middle point for a quadratic effect) then treat the factor as qualitative.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
WarrenKuhfeld
Ammonite | Level 13

Yes.  That is correct.  Two points define a line.  If you want a linear (quantitative) effect, then the correct behavior is to pick the extreme points.  That is most efficient.  If you want intermediate points (the middle point for a quadratic effect) then treat the factor as qualitative.

sarah123
Obsidian | Level 7
Thank you! I had a suspicion but this is new to me and I didn't see it written in any of the examples I worked through 🙂

sas-innovate-white.png

Our biggest data and AI event of the year.

Don’t miss the livestream kicking off May 7. It’s free. It’s easy. And it’s the best seat in the house.

Join us virtually with our complimentary SAS Innovate Digital Pass. Watch live or on-demand in multiple languages, with translations available to help you get the most out of every session.

 

Register now!

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 1327 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation