Guy, What is the projection that you are trying to convert into? The values that you are getting from the proc for that EPSG value appear to be correct. I looked up the range of values for the UTM represented by EPSG:3347, and those returned values are in the expected range. For reference, here is the definition of EPSG 3347 from spatialreference.org that I used: http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/nad83-statistics-canada-lambert/ Thanks, Scott
... View more