Thank you so much for the advice. Unfortunately, when I use type=choleski, I receive the following: WARNING: Pseudo-likelihood update fails in outer iteration 1. I am still trying to figure out what this means. However, in many cases, when I use a gamma distribution and an inverse link with the model you initially suggested above (random daystoend /residual type=sp(pow)(dte) subject=id), the model converges. There are empty values in the Output with the full model, but if I remove the group*daystoend interaction, there are no empty results in the Output. From my understanding, some distributions are better suited to certain types of data than others and I am still trying hard to understand how it is possible to choose a distribution that fits the data well but that is theoretically invalid and how this can affect Type1 and Type2 error. In your opinion, is dist=gamma link=inverse valid for the type of data I have? I know that gamma is often used to model the time to a particular event and in my case, it might be best suited for lag times between arousal and starting a particular behaviour. However, would I also be able to use gamma to model proportion of time spent expressing a behaviour? I am very grateful for your continued correspondance regarding this problem. Joel Jameson
... View more