Peter, Of course data_null_ is correct .. as he virtually always is! However, the other responses were also correct. For the fun of it I ran a one trial test on 1 million identical records. I stopped at one test as I happened to like the results: my proposed method came in first (cpu: 1.01 seconds), data_null_'s second (cpu: 1.04 seconds), and your suggestion third (cpu: 1.14 seconds). Of course, on repeated tests, I would guess that any of the methods could come in at any position. Your and datanull's methods are definitely easier to type and I'd gladly award both of you correct answers if I could, but it wasn't my post.
... View more