Hi:
I guess it comes down, for me, to this question:
-- do you need some feature in TAGSETS.RTF that is NOT available in the original RTF
Answering that question is going to require some testing. On the other hand, if 90% of what you want is OK with ODS RTF, and you only need TAGSETS.RTF for the remaining 10%, then is it really worth switching everything to TAGSETS.RTF just to only deal with 1 destination. The beautiful thing about having 2 ODS destinations that created RTF output is the ability to create your output the way you want. For example, if you KNOW that you are going to have multi-page tables and you absolutely want the "Continued" at the bottom of every page, where the table spills over to the next page, then that's an argument for TAGSETS.RTF. If your tables are "page-sized" or will fit on one page, then Continued is out of the picture, why not use regular ODS RTF?
Do you want the output to have "fixed page breaks" and wrapping, as set by SAS (ODS TAGSETS.RTF has vertical measurement so SAS page breaks are respected)? Or, do you want to allow the page breaks to depend on the Word margins (ODS RTF does not have vertical measurement).
If you want to have a table and a graph from the SG procedures side-by-side on one page, that is actually an argument for using ODS LAYOUT with ODS PDF (not ODS RTF).
Sorry, I don't have a one size fits all recommendation. I've been doing this too long to recommend hitching your output wagon to one destination and only one destination.
Cynthia
... View more