Oops, maybe if I'd heeded PGStats' suggestion, I could have had my work in the New York Times.
Yesterday the NYT ran Usain Bolt and the Fastest Men in the World Since 1896 - on the Same Track, which bears a strong resemblance to the Tableau chart that I critiqued above, which bears a strong resemblance to a 2012 NYT chart of 100m sprinters, which bears a strong resemblance to a 2012 NYT chart of 100m swimmers...
However, the three NYT'ers credited with the story do hint that the positions of the fastest men in the world on their charts don't really represent where the runners actually were on the track after 9.63 seconds, Usain Bolt's winning 100m time in 2012.
"We then pitted these runners against each other in an imaginary race, using their average speeds," is how the NY Times explains its methodology.
So, when the NY Times says, "we have Tom Burke, who won in Athens in 1896. His time, 12 seconds, puts him more than 60 feet behind the Bolts", keep in mind that this was figured using a simple calculation - (100m - 100m/12s * 9.63s) * 3.28084ft/m = 65ft - that's based on the assumption that sprinters have the same average velocity throughout a race, which Wired painstakingly illustrated is clearly not the case.
Oh well, good enough for NYT work.
... View more