TMKAIG, You just made me miss my old job at credit scoring--just a little bit. I had that feeling of "I hate to love when computers beat me!". I ran the default IGN, which came with a different grouping. I was expecting it to be a little worse than our eyeball, because c'mon proc eyeball rocks... Then I manually added the alternative groupings of eyeball and smbinning, because it only takes a minute to do it on the interactive menu. Comparison results: IGN wins, eyeball is a close second, smbinning last. Here a table with the results, and screenshots as an appendix. I hope another set of eyes make sure everything is OK... I have embarrassed myself more than once on the SAS communities :smileysilly:. Metric Interactive Grouping Node (default) Eyeball SMBinning Information Value 14.201 12.279 11.991 Gini 97.756 95.513 94.872 TMKAIG, last favor. You mentioned Chi-square. I never really used it, I always used IV. Do you recommend it, yes, no, why? Also if you have data sets that I can play with, please send them my way. I frequently beat the default IGN, but sometimes it is really useful, so I never make up my mind if I should run my preferred settings vs default first. I will do that on some free time. Thanks for the interesting exercise, and I hope this helps! -Miguel Appendix 1: SAS Credit Scoring for EM - Interactive Grouping Node results 0-2000 2001-4000 4001-6500 6501-8000 8001-10000 Appendix 2: Screenshots IGN default run IGN vs eyeball IGN vs smbinning
... View more