This is a discussion forum for the activities in the Robustness module of the Free SAS e-learning course, Responsible Innovation and Trustworthy AI.
Scenario: Credit Rating Agencies and the Subprime Crisis
Consider This:
Can a risk reduction strategy, like insurance contracts, actually increase risk?
How does independent oversight improve robustness?
Please share your ideas in this discussion.
If I was the insurance company, I would have to blame my own lack of foresight in crafting policy exclusions. These exclusions would in turn have made the policy holder more cautious.
Independent oversight can improve robustness using model to simulate the situations.
Yes. While insurance is designed to reduce risk, it can increase risk if used irresponsibly. In the 2008 financial crisis, firms relied on insurance to cover high-risk mortgage loans, assuming they were protected. This encouraged risky behavior, such as issuing subprime loans without proper checks. When claims surged, insurers couldn’t pay, leading to widespread collapse. So, a risk reduction strategy can backfire if it encourages complacency or risky actions.
Independent oversight ensures that financial practices are transparent, accountable, and follow regulations. It helps detect and correct risky behavior before it escalates. Oversight introduces checks and balances, such as audits, regulations, and reporting standards, that reduce the chance of systemic failure. Without oversight, organizations may act in self-interest, overlook critical risks, or exploit loopholes, weakening system robustness
Nearly 200 sessions are now available on demand in the Innovate Hub.
Watch Now →Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.