Wald test Logistic regression

[iuri_leite]

Dear colleagues,

When we run a logistic regression, we assume that the Wald test for a specific parameter has an asymptotic standard Normal distribution. Therefore, when we look at the 95% confidence interval provided for the parameter, before being exponentiated,it is calculated by the following expression: B±1.96SE. But, if the number of observations for the category associated to the parameter estimated is low, then the parameter will not have a Standard Normal distribution. If I am not mistaken, is there a way to change it when estimating a logistic regression?

Thank you in advance.

Best regards,

Iuri

[PaigeMiller]

---

@iuri_leite wrote:

Dear colleagues,

When we run a logistic regression, we assume that the Wald test for a specific parameter has an asymptotic standard Normal distribution. Therefore, when we look at the 95% confidence interval provided for the parameter, before being exponentiated,it is calculated by the following expression: B±1.96SE. But, if the number of observations for the category associated to the parameter estimated is low, then the parameter will not have a Standard Normal distribution. If I am not mistaken, is there a way to change it when estimating a logistic regression?

---

I'm not sure I understand the question. In particular, when you say "is there a way to change it", what does "it" refer to, what do you want to change?

If I was to guess at what you mean, you need to tell PROC LOGISTIC to compute the confidence intervals for the parameter estimates via the CLPARM= option.

[StatDave · Accepted solution]

You can change the confidence interval from a Wald interval to a likelihood-based interval. Specify CLPARM=PL to request the profile likelihood intervals. For details on their construction, see "Confidence Intervals for Parameters" in the Details section of the PROC LOGISTIC documentation.

[iuri_leite]

Dear @StatDave,

thanks a lot.

It worked just fine.

Best regards,

Iuri