Turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- Home
- /
- Analytics
- /
- Stat Procs
- /
- Proc Logistic or Proc Corr?

Options

- RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Posted 10-19-2018 01:47 PM
(2001 views)

Hi Guys,

I've posted a bit on this topic, so sorry if you've seen this before but I figured this might be a better board to get my specific question asked.

I am honestly fairly new to SAS and was thrown in the deep end, so a bunch of the technical jargon goes over my head, FYI.

I'm trying to run a Multivariable Analysis that wants to see if there is a correlation between status of disease (1= they have it 0= they don't) and 7 risk factors (symptoms).

5 of them are categorical (1= yes 0-no)

2 of them are continuous

I've dug it down to the fact that I need to use Proc Corr ( I think)

but do I use Kendall's Tau as my R2 and P value or Pearson's for my my R2 and P-value? ..or both depending on whether it's continuous or categorical?

----

But HONESTLY, wouldn't it be easier to use proc logistic since it doesn't worry about categorical or continuous and the outcome is binary?

3 REPLIES 3

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

It probably is easier to use Proc Logistic.

You can calculate the point-biserial correlation coefficient for 0/1 coded categorical variable with two categories using the Pearson's method.

With respect to continuous variables,

it depends on whether your data is 1. normally distributed and 2. likely to have outliers. The following thesis showed that Pearson's can be used for non-normally distributed data, but, because it is sensitive to outliers, Pearson's is not good for datasets where outliers are very likely:

Pearson’s, Spearman’s and Kendall’s correlation coefficients are the most commonly used measures of monotone association, with the latter two usually suggestedfor non-normally distributed data.

Pearson’s correlation coefficient could offer a substantial improvement in statistical power even for distributions with moderate skewness...

Nonetheless, because of its known sensitivity to outliers, Pearson’s correlation leads to a less powerful statistical test for distributions with

extremeskewness orexcessof kurtosis (where the datasets with outliers are more likely).

In conclusion,... Pearson’s correlation coefficient could have significant advantages for continuous non-normal data which does not have obvious outliers.

__Reference__

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Why do you start a new thread for essentially the exact same question? That's not necessary, it's not good, and people get confused by trying to assimilate replies in two different threads. Why don't we continue this at your original thread which is: https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Multivariate-analysis-Do-I-use-Proc-Corr-or-Proc-GLM-...

--

Paige Miller

Paige Miller

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- RSS Feed
- Permalink
- Report Inappropriate Content

Will do, thanks!

Build your skills. Make connections. Enjoy creative freedom. Maybe change the world. **Registration is now open through August 30th**. Visit the SAS Hackathon homepage.

What is ANOVA?

ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.