BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
yael
Quartz | Level 8

Hello

 

I have the following results and I'm not sure about the conclusions.

 

I am checking the impact of CEO in three stages. Stage 1,2 and 3. The results are as follows:

Stage 1 - 0.073 (p=0.05)

Stage 2 - 0.02 (p=0.01)

Stage 3 - 0.058 (p<0.0001)

 

All are positive impact, but I am trying to understand the difference between stage 1 and 3. Stage 1 is 0.073 but p=0.05 and stage 3 is with less impact but with higher significent. Can I say that the CEO impact is higher in stage 1 even if it is in p=0.05?

 

Thanks a lot!

 

 

2 REPLIES 2
PeterClemmensen
Tourmaline | Level 20

Yes. The impact inside your model of Stage 1 is larger than Stage 3 (given alpha = 0.05). I am guessing that the significance in this case reffers to t-testing your coefficients=0, in which case for all three stages, you reject the null hypothesis of the three stages having no impact on your response variable.

 

Ksharp
Super User
Use LSMEANS to check the mean between these two group.


SAS Innovate 2025: Call for Content

Are you ready for the spotlight? We're accepting content ideas for SAS Innovate 2025 to be held May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. The call is open until September 25. Read more here about why you should contribute and what is in it for you!

Submit your idea!

What is ANOVA?

ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 1425 views
  • 2 likes
  • 3 in conversation