BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
robin24
Calcite | Level 5

Hello Everyone !!!

 

Please share your experience and possible solution for below concern. 

 

Using PROC IMSTAT: A code is written to DELETE records from a LASR server table on a specified condition

and then APPENDS records from another table consisting of latest data.

 

Issue: 

Case 1. When code executed in SAS EG manually, LASR server tables get updated with exact values as required. 

Case 2. But when executed through scheduled SAS DI Job,  LASR server table gives missing numeric values for couple of columns, where as remaining numerical column values matches exactly with source tables.

Note: Total records at the end matches to source table in both the cases.

 

Please suggest why such difference and how same can be removed. 

 

 

Regards,

Robin Sharma

 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Reeza
Super User
Any notes/errors in the logs that differ?
Does this process include the import of any data, especially from a text file?

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Reeza
Super User
Any notes/errors in the logs that differ?
Does this process include the import of any data, especially from a text file?
SASKiwi
PROC Star

AFAIK any table used in SAS DI must also be registered in SAS metadata so one possible cause of your symptom is the metadata registration does not match the actual table attributes. I suggest you update the VA load table metadata registration to see if that fixes your problem.

SAS Innovate 2025: Save the Date

 SAS Innovate 2025 is scheduled for May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. Sign up to be first to learn about the agenda and registration!

Save the date!

Tips for filtering data sources in SAS Visual Analytics

See how to use one filter for multiple data sources by mapping your data from SAS’ Alexandria McCall.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 578 views
  • 0 likes
  • 3 in conversation