BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
eawhit10
Fluorite | Level 6

I have a rather large dataset in long format that I need wide. I tried proc transpose, but all my numeric variables were changed to character. 1) I don't even know how to change them back and don't want to do so individually anyway as there are a lot of variables 2) is there a way to transpose without this happening? 

 

Please see data (in reality there are about 63 variables, character and numeric, like vascular measures,  yes/no questions, more physical measures, etc). Any solution I find involving an array seems to require typing out all variables....

event_namestidincomeeducsexracehealthphtwtsbpdbpsmoke
baseline1001211566140.1144981
year_21001211466150.1144981
baseline2003324362.5130.2121732
year_22003324262.5125.8120862
baseline3001412164150.1129772
year_23001412364145.6114742

/* trying proc transpose*/

proc transpose data=longsort out=out1;
by stID event_name; 
var income -- dbp;
run;
proc transpose data=out1 delimiter=_ out=new2(drop=_name_);
by stid;
var col1;
id _name_ event_name;
run;
/* proc contents shows all are now character variables even the ones supposed to be numeric */

 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Tom
Super User Tom
Super User

So to go from semi-wide to really wide you can use a double transpose.  If you have mixed numeric/character data then do it in two part and then merge them.

data have;
  input event_name :$32. stid $ income $ educ $ sex $ race $ healthp $ ht wt sbp dbp smoke $;
cards;
baseline 100 1 2 1 1 5 66 140.1 144 98 1
year_2 100 1 2 1 1 4 66 150.1 144 98 1
baseline 200 3 3 2 4 3 62.5 130.2 121 73 2
year_2 200 3 3 2 4 2 62.5 125.8 120 86 2
baseline 300 1 4 1 2 1 64 150.1 129 77 2
year_2 300 1 4 1 2 3 64 145.6 114 74 2
;
proc sort data=have;
  by stid event_name;
run;

proc transpose data=have out=num;
  by stid event_name ; 
  var _numeric_;
run;
proc transpose data=num out=num_wide delimiter=_;
  by stid ;
  where lowcase(_name_) not in ('stid'  'event_name');
  id _name_ event_name;
  var col1;
run;

proc transpose data=have out=char;
  by stid event_name ; 
  var _character_;
run;
proc transpose data=char out=char_wide delimiter=_;
  by stid ;
  where lowcase(_name_) not in ('stid'  'event_name');
  id _name_ event_name;
  var col1;
run;

data want;
  merge num_wide char_wide ;
  by stid ; 
  drop _name_;
run;

image.png

View solution in original post

9 REPLIES 9
PaigeMiller
Diamond | Level 26

Are you showing us the transposed data or the un-transposed data?

 

I have a rather large dataset in long format that I need wide

 

Usually converting long to wide is not a good idea, although there are exceptions. Why do you need it to be wide?

--
Paige Miller
eawhit10
Fluorite | Level 6

I thought that in order to run some longitudinal tests, I needed it in wide data? A simple example would be like to compare weight from baseline and year 2, I'd need 2 columns, instead of observation at baseline in 1 row and row 2 is the observation at year 2.

eawhit10
Fluorite | Level 6

I'm showing un-transposed. I wanted new columns with like ht_baseline, ht_year_2, bp_baseline, bp_year_2, etc.  But the transpose code i originally posted changes all numeric vars to character.

data_null__
Jade | Level 19
var firstvar-character-lastvar;
var firstvar-numeric-lastvar;

One TRANSPOSE for character and another for numeric. Read up on "SAS Variable Lists".

Tom
Super User Tom
Super User

But you are already starting with a WIDE dataset.  

What is it you want to create?  Something WIDER?  How?

Tom
Super User Tom
Super User

So to go from semi-wide to really wide you can use a double transpose.  If you have mixed numeric/character data then do it in two part and then merge them.

data have;
  input event_name :$32. stid $ income $ educ $ sex $ race $ healthp $ ht wt sbp dbp smoke $;
cards;
baseline 100 1 2 1 1 5 66 140.1 144 98 1
year_2 100 1 2 1 1 4 66 150.1 144 98 1
baseline 200 3 3 2 4 3 62.5 130.2 121 73 2
year_2 200 3 3 2 4 2 62.5 125.8 120 86 2
baseline 300 1 4 1 2 1 64 150.1 129 77 2
year_2 300 1 4 1 2 3 64 145.6 114 74 2
;
proc sort data=have;
  by stid event_name;
run;

proc transpose data=have out=num;
  by stid event_name ; 
  var _numeric_;
run;
proc transpose data=num out=num_wide delimiter=_;
  by stid ;
  where lowcase(_name_) not in ('stid'  'event_name');
  id _name_ event_name;
  var col1;
run;

proc transpose data=have out=char;
  by stid event_name ; 
  var _character_;
run;
proc transpose data=char out=char_wide delimiter=_;
  by stid ;
  where lowcase(_name_) not in ('stid'  'event_name');
  id _name_ event_name;
  var col1;
run;

data want;
  merge num_wide char_wide ;
  by stid ; 
  drop _name_;
run;

image.png

eawhit10
Fluorite | Level 6

Thank you! This is what I was looking for. I know it seems excessively wide, but I didn't know how else to prepare the data to compare baseline measures vs year 2.

Tom
Super User Tom
Super User

@eawhit10 wrote:

Thank you! This is what I was looking for. I know it seems excessively wide, but I didn't know how else to prepare the data to compare baseline measures vs year 2.


Change from baseline calculations are easier in the original format.

data want;
  set have;
  by id;
  if visit='Baseline' then wt_baseline=wt;
  if first.id the call missing(wt_baseline);
  retain wt_baseline;
  if not missing(wt_baseline) then wt_change=wt-wt_baseline;
run;
Ksharp
Super User
data have;
  input event_name :$32. stid $ income $ educ $ sex $ race $ healthp $ ht wt sbp dbp smoke $;
cards;
baseline 100 1 2 1 1 5 66 140.1 144 98 1
year_2 100 1 2 1 1 4 66 150.1 144 98 1
baseline 200 3 3 2 4 3 62.5 130.2 121 73 2
year_2 200 3 3 2 4 2 62.5 125.8 120 86 2
baseline 300 1 4 1 2 1 64 150.1 129 77 2
year_2 300 1 4 1 2 3 64 145.6 114 74 2
;
proc sort data=have;
  by stid event_name;
run;
proc transpose data=have(obs=0) out=vname;
var _all_;
run;
proc sql;
create table level as
select *
 from (select distinct event_name from have),
 (select * from vname where lowcase(_name_) not in ('stid'  'event_name'))
 order by 1;
quit;
data _null_;
 set level end=last;
 by event_name;
 if _n_=1 then call execute('data want;merge ');
 if first.event_name then call execute(catt('have(where=(event_name="',event_name,'")  rename=('));
 call execute(catt(_name_,'=',_name_,'_',event_name));
 if last.event_name then call execute('))');
 if last then call execute(';by stid;drop event_name;run;');
run;

sas-innovate-2024.png

Don't miss out on SAS Innovate - Register now for the FREE Livestream!

Can't make it to Vegas? No problem! Watch our general sessions LIVE or on-demand starting April 17th. Hear from SAS execs, best-selling author Adam Grant, Hot Ones host Sean Evans, top tech journalist Kara Swisher, AI expert Cassie Kozyrkov, and the mind-blowing dance crew iLuminate! Plus, get access to over 20 breakout sessions.

 

Register now!

How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 9 replies
  • 755 views
  • 4 likes
  • 5 in conversation