Hi,
Can you please give an example or two of when a RETAIN statement is a redundancy and when it is a necessity?
Its never a redundancy, I would consider it explict versus implicit.
If you use the sum statement, it includes an implicit retain, but expliclity declaring that retain isn't a redundancy in my opinion it's just an explicit declaration so the user knows ahead of time that it will be retained.
In all other cases other than implicit the retain statement is required if you want to retain the value across rows.
I'm actually having a hard time understanding the rationale behind question, maybe you can expand on what you're looking for if it's understanding.
If its for an answer to a test question, it's a bad question IMO.
retain is redundant in :
data a;
array a a1 (0);
retain a1;
set sashelp.class end=done;
a1 = a1 + 1;
if done then put a1;
run;
All variables that come from a SAS data set are automatically retained. So RETAIN is redundant when the variable(s) named come from a SAS data set.
There are other cases, such as the one PGStats mentioned.
Are there cases where a variable does not come from a SAS, and a RETAIN is not redundant?
Are you ready for the spotlight? We're accepting content ideas for SAS Innovate 2025 to be held May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. The call is open until September 25. Read more here about why you should contribute and what is in it for you!
Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.
Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.