Hi all
In practice, I saw some SAS codes like
libname macro "..\Macros\"; libname macro "..\..\Macros\";
and they always pointed to the correct destination.
So my question is, how does "..\" and '..\..\' work here? Is there any limitation to use dot dot?
This isn't a SAS specific topic, more of a computer file reference question.
I think this post explains the relative approach of using paths rather than absolute paths.
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/absolute-relative-pathnames-unix/
@angelinading wrote:
Hi all
In practice, I saw some SAS codes like
libname macro "..\Macros\"; libname macro "..\..\Macros\";and they always pointed to the correct destination.
So my question is, how does "..\" and '..\..\' work here? Is there any limitation to use dot dot?
This isn't a SAS specific topic, more of a computer file reference question.
I think this post explains the relative approach of using paths rather than absolute paths.
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/absolute-relative-pathnames-unix/
@angelinading wrote:
Hi all
In practice, I saw some SAS codes like
libname macro "..\Macros\"; libname macro "..\..\Macros\";and they always pointed to the correct destination.
So my question is, how does "..\" and '..\..\' work here? Is there any limitation to use dot dot?
In Unix like environments
. represents current location or here
.. represents parent folder
These are relative representation of folder paths.
It's finally time to hack! Remember to visit the SAS Hacker's Hub regularly for news and updates.
Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.
Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.
Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.