BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
kwil
Fluorite | Level 6

Hi, 

 

I am trying to implement the bootstrapped skewness-adjusted t-statistic originally developed by Johnson (1978) and outlined in Lyon et al. (1999) to test the significance of my average buy-and-hold abnormal returns. I am just looking to use this for a one sample test, not as a two sample test. 

 

kwil_0-1601943217438.png

 

Is this as simple as using the bootstrap method in proc ttest? Any help would be really appreciated. 

Cheers. 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Rick_SAS
SAS Super FREQ

Yes, you can use the BOOTSTRAP statement in PROC TTEST. Ask for the BC (bias-corrected) interval if you are concerned about skewness. The TTEST doc shows formulas for all bootstrap intervals. For an example of how to use the BOOTSTRAP statement, see "The BOOTSTRAP statement for t tests in SAS" (although the article uses two-sample tests).

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Rick_SAS
SAS Super FREQ

Yes, you can use the BOOTSTRAP statement in PROC TTEST. Ask for the BC (bias-corrected) interval if you are concerned about skewness. The TTEST doc shows formulas for all bootstrap intervals. For an example of how to use the BOOTSTRAP statement, see "The BOOTSTRAP statement for t tests in SAS" (although the article uses two-sample tests).

sas-innovate-2026-white.png



April 27 – 30 | Gaylord Texan | Grapevine, Texas

Registration is open

Walk in ready to learn. Walk out ready to deliver. This is the data and AI conference you can't afford to miss.
Register now and lock in 2025 pricing—just $495!

Register now

How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 1428 views
  • 0 likes
  • 3 in conversation