BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
☑ This topic is solved. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
J111
Quartz | Level 8

Hello,

 

Please find below data Have and data Want.

The index for the first observation is 1 and then it is based on the following logic

index = lag(index) + rate/100/365 ;

-------------------------------------
data Have ;
input obs rate ;
cards ;
1 0.35
2 0.35
3 0.35
4 0.35
;
run ;

----------------------------

data Want ;
input obs index ;
cards ;
1 1
2 1.00000959
3 1.00001918
4 1.00002877
;
run ;

-----------------------------

 

My following code test was not good, pls adivse


data next ;
set have ;
length Index 8 ;
retain index 1 ;
_value = lag(index) ;
if obs  gt 1  then index = _value + rate/100/365 ;
run ;

--------------------

This is originally from EXCEL function ( E2+C3/100/365 ) such that column E is the index and column C is the rate.

 

Thanks

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
mkeintz
PROC Star

The problem is related to the fact that LAG is not a lookback function - it is an update FIFO queue function.   And you are updating that queue in the 

 _value = lag(index) ;

statement prior to the recalculation of INDEX in the

if obs  gt 1  then index = _value + rate/100/365 ;

statement.  So the recalculated INDEX value does not get into the queue in a timely way.

 

But in this case, you don't need LAG at all, since you are retaining INDEX. 

 

Simplify your code to

data next ;
  set have ;
  length Index 8 ;
  retain index 1 ;
  if obs gt 1 then index = index + rate/100/365;
run ;

 

--------------------------
The hash OUTPUT method will overwrite a SAS data set, but not append. That can be costly. Consider voting for Add a HASH object method which would append a hash object to an existing SAS data set

Would enabling PROC SORT to simultaneously output multiple datasets be useful? Then vote for
Allow PROC SORT to output multiple datasets

--------------------------

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5
Amir
PROC Star

Hi,

 

Perhaps I have not understood what you're asking, but when I ran your code, the index column that you calculated appears to match your want data:

 

Amir_0-1695292171247.png

 

Were you looking for something else?

 

 

Thanks & kind regards,

Amir.

J111
Quartz | Level 8

Hi,

Each observation should get a different value of index.

However, in the test code both observation 2 and 3 get the same value of index.

This is wrong.

 

Thanks

 

J111
Quartz | Level 8

J111_1-1695295156366.png

A little clarification:

The calculation above in Excel is correct.

How can we do it in SAS ?

mkeintz
PROC Star

The problem is related to the fact that LAG is not a lookback function - it is an update FIFO queue function.   And you are updating that queue in the 

 _value = lag(index) ;

statement prior to the recalculation of INDEX in the

if obs  gt 1  then index = _value + rate/100/365 ;

statement.  So the recalculated INDEX value does not get into the queue in a timely way.

 

But in this case, you don't need LAG at all, since you are retaining INDEX. 

 

Simplify your code to

data next ;
  set have ;
  length Index 8 ;
  retain index 1 ;
  if obs gt 1 then index = index + rate/100/365;
run ;

 

--------------------------
The hash OUTPUT method will overwrite a SAS data set, but not append. That can be costly. Consider voting for Add a HASH object method which would append a hash object to an existing SAS data set

Would enabling PROC SORT to simultaneously output multiple datasets be useful? Then vote for
Allow PROC SORT to output multiple datasets

--------------------------
J111
Quartz | Level 8

Many Thanks !

SAS Innovate 2025: Save the Date

 SAS Innovate 2025 is scheduled for May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. Sign up to be first to learn about the agenda and registration!

Save the date!

How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 5 replies
  • 1031 views
  • 0 likes
  • 3 in conversation