Hello,
I need to filter repeated measures if the dates (by id) are not 60 days apart. There are hundreds of id's in the dataset; I am showing three here.
Person 1 can be reduced to a single date (because they're the same). Person 2 can be reduced to a single date (I figure choosing the earliest date makes the most sense). Person 3 has 2 dates that are far enough apart to keep, but a third that would cause that row to be dropped (again wanting to keep the earliest date). Dates can be repeated and a person can have any number of dates from 1-10 (although no one has 7-9 oddly enough).
DATA have;
input id date mmddyy10.;
format date mmddyy10.;
CARDS;
1 2/20/2016
1 2/20/2016
2 1/25/2016
2 1/28/2016
2 2/4/2016
2 2/4/2016
3 3/18/2016
3 3/20/2016
3 9/6/2016
;
RUN;
DATA want;
input id date mmddyy10.;
format date mmddyy10.;
CARDS;
1 2/20/2016
2 1/25/2016
3 3/18/2016
3 9/6/2016
;
RUN;
Here's my logic for comparing dates, and an example of a person with three sorted dates:
Case1:
If date2-date1 <= 60, keep date1 and delete date2 For the next comparison date1 would be used again.
If date3-date1 <=60, keep date1 delete date3
====================================
Case2:
If date2-date1 >= 60, keep both dates(rows) At this point, when keeping both dates, the next comparison must be done using the latest date.
If date3-date2 >=60, keep both dates In this situation all three dates are retained. But had date3-date2 been <= 60 I would've dropped date3.
Any help is appreciated.
This is a case where you have to look ahead one observation to see if the upcoming gap is more than 60 days (or if the next observation starts a new id). You can do this via a MERGE statement where you merge observation1 with observation2 (with ID and DATE variables renamed), and then merge observation 2 with observation 3, etc. That is supported via the "FIRSTOBS=2" option in one of the objects of the MERGE statement below:
DATA have;
input id date mmddyy10.;
format date mmddyy10.;
CARDS;
1 2/20/2016
1 2/20/2016
2 1/25/2016
2 1/28/2016
2 2/4/2016
2 2/4/2016
3 3/18/2016
3 3/20/2016
3 9/6/2016
;
RUN;
data want (drop=_:);
do until (_nxt_id^=id or date+60<_nxt_date);
merge have
have (firstobs=2 keep=id date rename=(id=_nxt_id date=_nxt_date));
if _init_date=. then _init_date=date;
end;
date=_init_date;
run;
This is a case where you have to look ahead one observation to see if the upcoming gap is more than 60 days (or if the next observation starts a new id). You can do this via a MERGE statement where you merge observation1 with observation2 (with ID and DATE variables renamed), and then merge observation 2 with observation 3, etc. That is supported via the "FIRSTOBS=2" option in one of the objects of the MERGE statement below:
DATA have;
input id date mmddyy10.;
format date mmddyy10.;
CARDS;
1 2/20/2016
1 2/20/2016
2 1/25/2016
2 1/28/2016
2 2/4/2016
2 2/4/2016
3 3/18/2016
3 3/20/2016
3 9/6/2016
;
RUN;
data want (drop=_:);
do until (_nxt_id^=id or date+60<_nxt_date);
merge have
have (firstobs=2 keep=id date rename=(id=_nxt_id date=_nxt_date));
if _init_date=. then _init_date=date;
end;
date=_init_date;
run;
Are you ready for the spotlight? We're accepting content ideas for SAS Innovate 2025 to be held May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. The call is open until September 16. Read more here about why you should contribute and what is in it for you!
Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.
Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.
Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for: