BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
lle
Calcite | Level 5 lle
Calcite | Level 5

Hi,

 

I'm creating a C# SAS V5 generator (.xpt files).

 

My output files are stored in .xpt and encoded in ISO-8859-1 (1252 code).

 

I followed all the SAS documentation for well exporting but i'm facing some problems with my numbers conversion.

 

E.g., when converting C# int into their floating-point representation, i got some mistakes. I have a unit test exporting my data in .xpt format, then I load them into SAS and read it with %xpt2loc maccro. For sequence number, my 8 is read as "3.9375", my 16 as "A".. It's not random mistakes, it's always the same.

 

I'm working with Alan Churchill C# converter (december 2012) - https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/492449/Transform-between-IEEE-IBM-or-VAX-floating-point , or maybe you have an other solution ?

 

Here is a sample of my code,

 

var converter = new Converter();
converter.Process(Endian.BigEndian);
var bytes = converter.ConvertDoubleToBytes(Platform.IbmFloat, (double)data_);
var byteString = Encoding.GetEncoding(1252).GetString(bytes);
return PadString(byteString, _fieldSizes[index_]);

 

for a numeric var, _fieldSizes[index_] is always equals to 8.

 

Hope you can help.

1 REPLY 1
ChrisNZ
Tourmaline | Level 20

Interesting endeavour.
Sorry I can't help you, but reading your question raised a few thoughts.
1. I would start with a SAS-encoded file and see what the output for your data is.
2. Did you read this and  this? Maybe @BarbaraPost can help.

hackathon24-white-horiz.png

The 2025 SAS Hackathon has begun!

It's finally time to hack! Remember to visit the SAS Hacker's Hub regularly for news and updates.

Latest Updates

How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 1 reply
  • 726 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation