BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
clcl
Calcite | Level 5

quick question about proc logistic, do i need to define class variables ?? 

i have seen i few examples on the sas online docs some do and some dont .....

and just to make sure if i do define the class variables do i need to add the predicted to it ???  ( i dont think so .. )

Thanks CL  

2 REPLIES 2
PGStats
Opal | Level 21

You must define any nominal predictor variable (a predictor whose value as no numerical meaning, e.g. SEX, STATE) as a class variable. The dependent variable (predicted) is implicitly defined as class.  - PG

PG
Doc_Duke
Rhodochrosite | Level 12

To add to PG's comment, if your class variable is numeric and coded 0 and 1 (binary), then you can treat it as a continuous predictor variable (that's what we had to do before the CLASS statement was added to LOGISTIC).  You will get identical p-values to a binary CLASS variable (like SEX), but the coefficients might be reversed depending on the parameterization.

Sometimes ordinal variables are treated as class variables and sometimes not (PROC LOGISTIC does not recognize a specific data type of "ordinal").  If you are willing to consider the ordered values to be equally spaced on the real line, then you could treat it as continuous and (generally) get reasonable answers.  When I am trying to decide which way to go, I'll do a lot of plots ahead to understand the behavior of the ordinal variable relative to the outcome.

Doc Muhlbaier

Duke

hackathon24-white-horiz.png

The 2025 SAS Hackathon has begun!

It's finally time to hack! Remember to visit the SAS Hacker's Hub regularly for news and updates.

Latest Updates

What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 1271 views
  • 0 likes
  • 3 in conversation