BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
Ying
Fluorite | Level 6

Hello,

Could someone help to explain why the numeric values were not read correctly?   Thank you!  Yvonne

data id;

  input id best32.;

  format id 20.;

datalines;

2416303039498861622

2416303543869862689

2416307785486124532

2416309804262141822

; run;

proc print; run;

------output--------

Obs                     id

1     2416303039498861568
2     2416303543869862912
3     2416307785486124544
4     2416309804262141952

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
SASKiwi
PROC Star

Your ID field is too long for SAS to hold accurately as a number - around 15 digits is the maximum. For ID-type fields read these as character to fix your problem:

input id $20.;

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
SASKiwi
PROC Star

Your ID field is too long for SAS to hold accurately as a number - around 15 digits is the maximum. For ID-type fields read these as character to fix your problem:

input id $20.;

Ying
Fluorite | Level 6

Thank you!

But I have other tables with numeric ID (length 20.), this table was from 3rd party.  Does  it mean I need to convert others to a character ID?  Not very efficient but if there is no choice.

SASKiwi
PROC Star

Unfortunately yes. In what form do you receive these tables? If they are delimited or fixed-length text files you may be able to read them in as character to begin with.

CFC_SAS_Communities_400x225.jpg

Call for content now open!

It's your turn to help shape SAS Innovate 2027. Share your expertise and inspire the SAS community.

Submit your proposal →

What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 3 replies
  • 3197 views
  • 1 like
  • 2 in conversation