BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
NKormanik
Barite | Level 11

Please view the following page, at the very bottom:

 

http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/68162/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_glmselect_ex...

 

Attached is a screenshot of the relevant section.

 

Parameter Estimates.jpg

 

I'm trying to interpret this.  Seems to me that the 'model' presented is not so good.  These are standardized coefficients.  The largest, by far, is the Intercept.  All the rest are relatively very small.

 

Would you interpret the results this way?  What am I missing?

 

Thanks!

 

Nicholas Kormanik

 

 

1 REPLY 1
Haris
Lapis Lazuli | Level 10
Without learning the meaning of all variables and, specifically, the outcome, the interpretation is not universal. Say your outcome is Height. The intercept will be around 6 feet for men and the impact of variables will be measured in inches or 1/12 of a foot. Relative sizes of standardized model coefficients are not a good way to estimate model fit.

sas-innovate-wordmark-2025-midnight.png

Register Today!

Join us for SAS Innovate 2025, our biggest and most exciting global event of the year, in Orlando, FL, from May 6-9. Sign up by March 14 for just $795.


Register now!

What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 1 reply
  • 901 views
  • 2 likes
  • 2 in conversation