BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
☑ This topic is solved. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
Coooooo_Lee
Obsidian | Level 7

Hi,

 

Thanks very much if anyone can help to resolve below issue.

I've got a problem regarding the proc report. Below are the test code and result.

 

data test;
  input c1 $
	    c2 $
	    c3 $
	    c4 $
	    c5 $;
datalines;
A 1001 70/M C3D1 1
A 1001 70/M C3D1 2
A 1001 70/M C5D1 1
A 1001 70/M C5D1 2
A 1001 70/M C7D1 1
A 1001 70/M C7D1 2
A 1002 68/F SCR  1
A 1002 68/F SCR  2
A 1002 68/F C3D1 1
A 1002 68/F C3D1 2
A 1002 68/F C5D1 1
A 1002 68/F C5D1 2
;
RUN;



PROC REPORT DATA=TEST NOWD HEADLINE HEADSKIP SPLIT='#' SPACING=1 MISSING ;
column c1 c2 c3  c4  c5;  
 define c1 /  'C1' order order=data;

  define c2 /  'C2' order order=data ;

  define c3 /  'C3' order order=data;

  define c4 /  'C4'  order order=data ;

  define c5 /  'C5';
RUN;

 

Why  order in the result is different from the dataset?

I've set each order option as oder=data.

 

For the 1002, the records when C4="SCR"  go after the C3D1, how can I ouput the order the same as datasets?

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
FreelanceReinh
Jade | Level 19

Hi @Coooooo_Lee,

 


@Coooooo_Lee wrote:

Why  order in the result is different from the dataset?

I've set each order option as oder=data.


This is because ORDER=DATA looks at the entire dataset. Since C4 values "C3D1", "C5D1" and "C7D1" occur before "SCR" in the data (for a different C2 value, though, but this doesn't matter), this order is used consistently throughout the report.

 

Basically the same issue was discussed earlier this year in the thread "PROC REPORT order=data within levels of grouping variable". The solution provided there should work for your data, too.

 

Edit:

Here's how you could implement that solution:

data want;
set test;
by c1-c4 notsorted;
realorder+first.c4;
run;

proc report data=want headline headskip split='#' spacing=1 missing;
column c1-c3 realorder c4 c5;
define c1 /  'C1'  order order=data;
define c2 /  'C2'  order order=data;
define c3 /  'C3'  order order=data;
define realorder / order noprint;
define c4 /  'C4'  order order=data;
define c5 /  'C5';
run;

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
FreelanceReinh
Jade | Level 19

Hi @Coooooo_Lee,

 


@Coooooo_Lee wrote:

Why  order in the result is different from the dataset?

I've set each order option as oder=data.


This is because ORDER=DATA looks at the entire dataset. Since C4 values "C3D1", "C5D1" and "C7D1" occur before "SCR" in the data (for a different C2 value, though, but this doesn't matter), this order is used consistently throughout the report.

 

Basically the same issue was discussed earlier this year in the thread "PROC REPORT order=data within levels of grouping variable". The solution provided there should work for your data, too.

 

Edit:

Here's how you could implement that solution:

data want;
set test;
by c1-c4 notsorted;
realorder+first.c4;
run;

proc report data=want headline headskip split='#' spacing=1 missing;
column c1-c3 realorder c4 c5;
define c1 /  'C1'  order order=data;
define c2 /  'C2'  order order=data;
define c3 /  'C3'  order order=data;
define realorder / order noprint;
define c4 /  'C4'  order order=data;
define c5 /  'C5';
run;

SAS Innovate 2025: Call for Content

Are you ready for the spotlight? We're accepting content ideas for SAS Innovate 2025 to be held May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. The call is open until September 25. Read more here about why you should contribute and what is in it for you!

Submit your idea!

What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 1 reply
  • 599 views
  • 5 likes
  • 2 in conversation