BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
gsk
Obsidian | Level 7 gsk
Obsidian | Level 7

For instance, after a variable, we can put label = '~' to label a variable. Can we label variables with * instead of typing out all the variables and putting label = ' ~~ '  next to each?

 

PROC SQL;
Title 'a) All Rows and Columns Without Labels';
   SELECT *   <- After putting SELECT * instead of listing all the variables: is there an easier way to label each variable? 
   FROM directory.dataset;

QUIT; 

2 REPLIES 2
Reeza
Super User

No, I don’t think you can, for starters how would the compiler know which variables to label. 

 

If you have a data set with the mapping of variables to labels you can do an automated labelling process. 

 

If you’re using * because you’re too lazy to list them all, a perfectly valid reason, use the FEEDBACK option in the PROC SQL statement and check the log. It will have the full code with appropriate alias and you can modify it as necessary. 

 

You can also add labels after the fact using PROC DATASETS. 

RW9
Diamond | Level 26 RW9
Diamond | Level 26

No, you can't label variables when selecting all.  Its rarely a good idea to use the * anyways, it can cause issues, and will definately make you sql take longer to run and use more disk space.  I would always use explicit definitions of what you want to select, from where, and what specific data, not only does this make the code nice an transparent, but as quick as it can be.

SAS Innovate 2025: Register Now

Registration is now open for SAS Innovate 2025 , our biggest and most exciting global event of the year! Join us in Orlando, FL, May 6-9.
Sign up by Dec. 31 to get the 2024 rate of just $495.
Register now!

What is Bayesian Analysis?

Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

SAS Training: Just a Click Away

 Ready to level-up your skills? Choose your own adventure.

Browse our catalog!

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 1986 views
  • 3 likes
  • 3 in conversation