BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.

I'm trying to understand how PROC EXPAND works and why one calculation isn't working the way I expect.

 

I don't understand why the third one doesn't work the way as expected.

 

The first two calculations are correct, but LEAD doesn't generate the data expected.

From this original discussion:

http://stackoverflow.com/q/42395126/1919583

 

*create sample data to work with;
data random;
    call streaminit(25);

    do date='01Jan2016'd to '31Dec2016'd;
        x=round(Rand('normal', 100, 15), 0.01);
        output;
        format date date9.;
    end;
run;

*Modified calculation;
proc expand data=random out=want;
    id date;
    convert x= x_movSum /transformout = (movsum 10 trimleft 9); /*This is the correct calculation expected*/
    convert x = x_movSumFIRST / transformout = (reverse movsum 10 trimleft 9 reverse);
    convert x = x_movSumWRONG /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movesum 10 reverse); /*suggest via Tom*/
run;
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
udo_sas
SAS Employee

Hello -

If I understand your question correctly you are mostly wondering about the effect of "lead 10", correct?

 

proc expand data=random out=want;
    id date;
    convert x = x_movSumWRONG /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movesum 10 reverse); /*suggest via Tom*/
run;

 

Your data (random) looks like this - leaving out some data in the middle:

date x
1-Jan-16 114.68
2-Jan-16 83.68
3-Jan-16 111.5
4-Jan-16 86.82
5-Jan-16 103.46
6-Jan-16 92.85
7-Jan-16 88.22
8-Jan-16 98.48
9-Jan-16 99.5
10-Jan-16 132.27
11-Jan-16 87.05
12-Jan-16 99.98
13-Jan-16 75.69
20-Dec-16 93.67
21-Dec-16 114.5
22-Dec-16 94.1
23-Dec-16 96.01
24-Dec-16 104.5
25-Dec-16 104.69
26-Dec-16 116.58
27-Dec-16 98.41
28-Dec-16 103.41
29-Dec-16 110.42
30-Dec-16 90.44
31-Dec-16 88.62

 

  • Lead 10 will tell EXPAND to forget about the first 10 observations (obs) - so your time series now starts at 87.05 - you will introduce missing values are the end of your series (unless you would add SETMISS 0, which would append 0s instead).
  • Reverse will tell EXPAND to reverse the order, the missing values you introduced will be your new first obs, 87.05 your new last obs.
  • Movesum 10 will create the backward moving sum of 10 obs.
  • Finally Reserve will put the series into its original order again.

 

If you decompose your "wrong" statement into:

proc expand data=random out=want;
    id date;
    convert x = x_lead10 /transformout = (lead 10);
    convert x = x_reverse /transformout = (lead 10 reverse);
    convert x = x_movsum10 /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movsum 10);
    convert x = x_reverseII /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movsum 10 reverse);
run;

 

you will see these columns in WANT.

snapshot.JPG

In my mind this is the expected behaviour - it is just not the same what you'd like to archive with:

 convert x= x_movSum /transformout = (movsum 10 trimleft 9);

 

Hope this makes sense,

Udo

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
udo_sas
SAS Employee

Hello -

If I understand your question correctly you are mostly wondering about the effect of "lead 10", correct?

 

proc expand data=random out=want;
    id date;
    convert x = x_movSumWRONG /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movesum 10 reverse); /*suggest via Tom*/
run;

 

Your data (random) looks like this - leaving out some data in the middle:

date x
1-Jan-16 114.68
2-Jan-16 83.68
3-Jan-16 111.5
4-Jan-16 86.82
5-Jan-16 103.46
6-Jan-16 92.85
7-Jan-16 88.22
8-Jan-16 98.48
9-Jan-16 99.5
10-Jan-16 132.27
11-Jan-16 87.05
12-Jan-16 99.98
13-Jan-16 75.69
20-Dec-16 93.67
21-Dec-16 114.5
22-Dec-16 94.1
23-Dec-16 96.01
24-Dec-16 104.5
25-Dec-16 104.69
26-Dec-16 116.58
27-Dec-16 98.41
28-Dec-16 103.41
29-Dec-16 110.42
30-Dec-16 90.44
31-Dec-16 88.62

 

  • Lead 10 will tell EXPAND to forget about the first 10 observations (obs) - so your time series now starts at 87.05 - you will introduce missing values are the end of your series (unless you would add SETMISS 0, which would append 0s instead).
  • Reverse will tell EXPAND to reverse the order, the missing values you introduced will be your new first obs, 87.05 your new last obs.
  • Movesum 10 will create the backward moving sum of 10 obs.
  • Finally Reserve will put the series into its original order again.

 

If you decompose your "wrong" statement into:

proc expand data=random out=want;
    id date;
    convert x = x_lead10 /transformout = (lead 10);
    convert x = x_reverse /transformout = (lead 10 reverse);
    convert x = x_movsum10 /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movsum 10);
    convert x = x_reverseII /transformout = (lead 10 reverse movsum 10 reverse);
run;

 

you will see these columns in WANT.

snapshot.JPG

In my mind this is the expected behaviour - it is just not the same what you'd like to archive with:

 convert x= x_movSum /transformout = (movsum 10 trimleft 9);

 

Hope this makes sense,

Udo

Reeza
Super User

Makes sense, thanks Udo 🙂

sas-innovate-2024.png

Don't miss out on SAS Innovate - Register now for the FREE Livestream!

Can't make it to Vegas? No problem! Watch our general sessions LIVE or on-demand starting April 17th. Hear from SAS execs, best-selling author Adam Grant, Hot Ones host Sean Evans, top tech journalist Kara Swisher, AI expert Cassie Kozyrkov, and the mind-blowing dance crew iLuminate! Plus, get access to over 20 breakout sessions.

 

Register now!

Multiple Linear Regression in SAS

Learn how to run multiple linear regression models with and without interactions, presented by SAS user Alex Chaplin.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 1745 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation