data ARIMA_ASTHMA_AB;
Set ASTHMA_ab;
step= (Quarter>='2020-Q1');
ramp= time_after;
if Quarter < '2020-Q1' then ramp=0;
Run;
Trial (1);
proc arima data=ARIMA_ASTHMA_AB;
identify var= Preval_qtr_ResprtyAnti (2,4) crosscorr=(step(2,4) ramp(2,4));
estimate p=2 q=(4) input=(step ramp) method=ml outmodel=AB_AS3;
run; quit;
Trial(2);
proc arima data=ARIMA_ASTHMA_AB;
identify var= Preval_qtr_ResprtyAnti (2,4) crosscorr=(step ramp);
estimate p=1 q=(4) input=(step ramp) method=ml outmodel=AB_AS5;
run; quit;
Hello,
I am using ITS (ARIMA) to study the impact of intervention on drug utilzation.
Based on the above codes: My question is when to use crosscorr= [Step(1,4) Ramp(1,4)] and when to use only crosscorr= [Step Ramp]?
I know in order to choose between different ARIMA models, I need to check SBC and AIC (the lower the better model).
Also, I attached the output for both trial 1 and 3 SAS codes. Could you please advise which model is better and why?
Thanks in advance.
Hello @LNA2021 ,
I have moved your question to the
SAS Forecasting and Econometrics board (under the Analytics header).
You will get much better answers here.
Note there's a lot of literature on this subject.
And many approaches are taken : ARIMA(X) , State Space Models (SSM), Mixed models , ...
But to re-assure you : PROC ARIMA can definitely be used for interrupted time series analysis.
Cheers,
Koen
Join us for SAS Innovate 2025, our biggest and most exciting global event of the year, in Orlando, FL, from May 6-9. Sign up by March 14 for just $795.
Learn how to run multiple linear regression models with and without interactions, presented by SAS user Alex Chaplin.
Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.