BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
Rsadiq1
Calcite | Level 5

    Hello I am getting a syntax error that is not making sense to me, if anyone could help

 

ARNING: Apparent symbolic reference POL_NBR not resolved.
ERROR 22-322: Syntax error, expecting one of the following: a quoted string, a numeric constant, a datetime constant,
              a missing value, (, -, SELECT. 

 

 

WHERE UPCASE(C.POL_NBR) IN (&pol_nbr.)
               and ADR.ST_CD in (&statlst.)
               and (datepart(AC.CREAT_DTTM) >= input("&bak14.",mmddyy10.))
               and P.ENRL_DT~=.
               and P.PGM_CATGY_TYP_ID in ("04")
               and P.PGM_TYP_ID not in ("52","04")            
               and P.MBR_PGM_STS_RSN_TYP_ID = "81"
               and P.MBR_PGM_STS_TYP_ID = '05'
          ORDER BY M.MBR_ID
     ;
quit;

2 REPLIES 2
ballardw
Super User

Showing the entire code is better.

 

The warning says that at the time the macro processor attempts to evaluate this line:

UPCASE(C.POL_NBR) IN (&pol_nbr.)

no value has been assigned to the macro variable &pol_nbr.

 

The error follows because this comparison

where UPCASE(C.POL_NBR) IN ()

is invalid without at least one value inside the () after in.

kanivan51
Obsidian | Level 7
Hi! &pol_nbr. - is this a single value or not? If it is not - check for quotation and punctuation. Show us the code, please

Ready to join fellow brilliant minds for the SAS Hackathon?

Build your skills. Make connections. Enjoy creative freedom. Maybe change the world. Registration is now open through August 30th. Visit the SAS Hackathon homepage.

Register today!
SAS Enterprise Guide vs. SAS Studio

What’s the difference between SAS Enterprise Guide and SAS Studio? How are they similar? Just ask SAS’ Danny Modlin.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 2 replies
  • 841 views
  • 0 likes
  • 3 in conversation