cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
Xolani_Simelane
Calcite | Level 5 Xolani_Simelane
Calcite | Level 5

SAS Enterprise Miner Association Node (Consolidate Time properties)

Posted 01-17-2019 09:14 AM (946 views)

 When using Association node for sequence analysis, there are 2 paramters called consolidate time and maximum transaction duration. May I check what's the unit of the 2 fields? For example, if the sequence in my data set is in days and I want to consolidate transactions within 2 days, shall I put "consolidate time = 2 (days) " or "consolidate time = 48 (hours)" ? 

0 Likes
Reply
1 REPLY 1
BrettWujek
SAS Employee BrettWujek
SAS Employee

Re: SAS Enterprise Miner Association Node (Consolidate Time properties)

Posted 01-17-2019 09:29 AM (941 views)  |   In reply to Xolani_Simelane

The documentation for this node states that the consolidate time is in hours. The maximum transaction duration does not state the units, but does relate it to consolidation time so I believe it is the same units.

 

https://go.documentation.sas.com/?docsetId=emref&docsetTarget=n16x97j506upgin1l90wrfc1rg0l.htm&docse...

 

Hope this helps.

Brett


Register today and join us virtually on June 16!
sasglobalforum.com | #SASGF

View now: on-demand content for SAS users
0 Likes
Reply

hackathon24-white-horiz.png

2025 SAS Hackathon: There is still time!

Good news: We've extended SAS Hackathon registration until Sept. 12, so you still have time to be part of our biggest event yet – our five-year anniversary!

Register Now

How to choose a machine learning algorithm

Use this tutorial as a handy guide to weigh the pros and cons of these commonly used machine learning algorithms.

Watch How to choose a machine learning algorithm on YouTube

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 1 reply
  • ‎01-17-2019 09:14 AM
  • 947 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation