BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
hemi
Calcite | Level 5

Noticed this interesting behaviour today. I'm trying to match the following category rule:

 

(ORDDIST_8,"get","statement","got","for","let")

 

Excuse the nonsense - it was stripped down to try and make sense of why the rule wouldn't return a match.

 

So the following text matches:

 

get statement for but got for let

 

But not this:

 

get statement for but got for let for

 

Is there any logical reason the additional "for" at the end of the sentence would stop the rule from returning a match?

 

Cheers

 

 

hackathon24-white-horiz.png

The 2025 SAS Hackathon has begun!

It's finally time to hack! Remember to visit the SAS Hacker's Hub regularly for news and updates.

Latest Updates

How to choose a machine learning algorithm

Use this tutorial as a handy guide to weigh the pros and cons of these commonly used machine learning algorithms.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 0 replies
  • 688 views
  • 0 likes
  • 1 in conversation