Which one is better: Static vs Dynamic Asset and Liability Management

[#1]

Asset and Liability Management is an important practice for financial institutions, which enables them to manage the risks associated with mismatches between assets and liabilities. With the advanced capabilities of SAS ALM on Viya, organizations can implement both static and dynamic approaches, each offering distinct advantages and considerations.

The purpose of this post is to explore the key differences between Static and Dynamic Asset and Liability Management (ALM) within the context of SAS Viya.

Understanding these key differences is mandatory for financial professionals looking to optimize their risk management strategies.

What is Asset and Liability Management (ALM)?

Asset and Liability Management (ALM) is the process of managing financial risks that arise due to mismatches between the assets and liabilities of an institution. It is an important practice for banks, insurance companies, and other financial entities to ensure long-term profitability and solvency. ALM strategies typically involve monitoring interest rate risk, liquidity risk, and other financial risks, and taking actions to mitigate these risks over time.

Static ALM: A Snapshot in Time

Static ALM refers to a risk management approach where the analysis is based on a fixed set of assumptions at a particular point in time. It is often seen as a more traditional method, focusing on the current balance sheet without considering future changes in the economic environment or the institution’s financial position.

Key Characteristics of Static ALM:

• Fixed Time Horizon: The analysis is conducted based on the assumption that the current balance sheet will remain static over a specified period.
• Assumptions: Interest rates, cash flows, and other variables are assumed to remain constant during the analysis period.
• Simplicity: The approach is generally easier to implement and understand, making it suitable for institutions with less complex financial structures or those seeking a quick snapshot of their risk exposure.
• Limitations: Since it does not account for future changes, static ALM may not provide a comprehensive view of long-term risks. This can lead to suboptimal decision-making in a rapidly changing market environment.

Dynamic ALM: Adapting to Change

Dynamic ALM, on the other hand, is a more sophisticated and flexible approach that considers the potential changes in the economic environment, interest rates, and other factors over time. This method involves continuous monitoring and adjusting the ALM strategy based on new information and evolving conditions.

Key Characteristics of Dynamic ALM:

• Variable Time Horizon: Dynamic ALM operates over a longer time horizon and continuously updates assumptions as new data becomes available.
• Scenario Analysis: It often includes scenario analysis and stress testing, allowing institutions to evaluate the impact of various hypothetical scenarios on their balance sheet.
• Flexibility: The approach is adaptable, making it suitable for institutions operating in volatile markets or those with complex financial structures.
• Advanced Risk Management: By considering future changes and incorporating various risk factors, dynamic ALM provides a more holistic view of risk, enabling better-informed decision-making.

Static vs. Dynamic ALM in SAS Viya

SAS ALM on Viya offers tools for both static and dynamic ALM, allowing institutions to choose the approach that best fits their needs. Here’s how these approaches can be implemented within SAS Viya:

Static ALM: SAS Viya can model a static ALM approach by using historical data and fixed assumptions to analyze the current balance sheet. Users can generate reports that provide a snapshot of the institution's risk exposure based on the existing financial position.

Dynamic ALM: For dynamic ALM, SAS Viya’s advanced analytics capabilities come into play. The platform supports scenario analysis, stress testing, and continuous monitoring of the balance sheet. Institutions can simulate various future economic conditions and adjust their strategies in real-time, ensuring they remain aligned with their risk management objectives.

Select any image to see a larger version.
Mobile users: To view the images, select the "Full" version at the bottom of the page.

Choosing the Right Approach

The choice between static and dynamic ALM depends on several factors, including the complexity of the institution’s balance sheet, the volatility of the markets in which it operates, and the institution’s overall risk management goals. In practice, many institutions use a combination of both approaches, leveraging the strengths of each to build a comprehensive ALM strategy. Here are just 2 examples of how you can decide what is best for your organization:

1. Small Local Bank with Simple Balance Sheet

• A small, community bank with relatively simple operations and a straightforward balance sheet might opt for Static ALM. The bank’s primary assets may consist of long-term, fixed-rate mortgages, while its liabilities are mostly customer deposits with predictable withdrawal patterns.
• Reason: Since the bank operates in a stable local market with limited exposure to interest rate fluctuations or volatile assets, it might not need to continuously adjust its strategy. Using a static ALM approach, the bank can conduct regular, periodic assessments to ensure that its assets and liabilities are aligned, focusing more on immediate conditions rather than future changes.
• Benefit: Static ALM here provides simplicity, lower costs, and ease of implementation, as there’s little need for continuous monitoring or complex scenario analysis.

2. Large National Bank with Complex Investments

• A large national or international bank with a more diverse portfolio, including variable-rate loans, derivatives, and international investments, would benefit from using Dynamic ALM.
• Reason: This bank operates in multiple markets and faces a higher degree of uncertainty due to fluctuating interest rates, foreign exchange risks, and varying credit qualities. By using a dynamic ALM approach, the bank can model different scenarios (e.g., interest rate increases, changes in inflation, or economic shocks) and adjust its asset and liability positions in real time.
• Benefit: Dynamic ALM allows the bank to be more flexible and responsive to changing market conditions, helping to mitigate risks and optimize profitability in a dynamic and constantly changing financial environment.

Conclusion

Static and Dynamic ALM represent two different approaches to managing financial risk, each with its own advantages and limitations. SAS Viya provides the tools necessary to implement both strategies, enabling institutions to tailor their ALM practices to their specific needs. Whether you need a fast snapshot of your risk exposure or an adaptive strategy that's forward-looking, knowing the differences between static and dynamic ALM becomes quite important for proper risk management.

For further learning, consider exploring the SAS Viya documentation on ALM, which offers in-depth guidance on implementing all these strategies.

Find more articles from SAS Global Enablement and Learning here.