BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
dapenDaniel
Obsidian | Level 7

Hello,

 

I am working on a dataset (see below). The dataset list the components of a product and other relevant information. 

 

Dataset                                                                                             

 

FirmID   ProductID  BeginYear   MarketYear   Components                   

10001     AB259T      1996             1998              B30 | A                        

10001     AB259T      1996             1998              V55 | U                        

10001    AA386G      1999             2001              T92 | B                         

10001    AA386G      1999             2001              R26 | L                         

10001    AA386G      1999             2001              V55 | U

10002    CT746B       2007            2009              U38 | P

10002    CT746B       2007            2009              X48 | O

10002    CT746B       2007            2009              K93 | E

10002    RU239F       2008            2010              O28 | L

10002    RU239F       2008            2010              A47 | W

10003    TY569I         2008            2010              Q15 | P

10003    GC992M      2009            2011              W91 | O

10003    GC992M      2009            2011              Q15 | P

 

 All the components of each firm consist of a component base. This component base is updated annually as firms introduce more products. For example, the component base for Firm 10001 in 1996 only includes two components ( B30 | A and V55 | U) and it has four components in 1999 ( B30 | A, V55 | U, T92 | B and R26 | L). 

 

I would like to know how many incremental products and radical products each firm has for each year.

 

If all the components of a new product do not overlap with the existing component base, it will be considered as radical products. For example, RU239F is a radical product for firm 10002 because none of its components overlaps with its existing component base.

 

If one of the components of a new product overlaps with the existing component base, it will be considered as incremental products. For example, AA386G is an incremental product for firm 10001 because one of its components (V55 | U) already exists in its component base. So as GC992M for firm 10003.

 

Can anyone tell me what code do I need to use? Thanks.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
Ksharp
Super User

Assuming I understand your question and Data has been sorted by FirmID ProductID BeginYear ;

 

data have;
input 
FirmID   ProductID $ BeginYear   MarketYear   Components & $20.   ;               
cards;
10001     AB259T      1996             1998              B30 | A                        
10001     AB259T      1996             1998              V55 | U                        
10001    AA386G      1999             2001              T92 | B                         
10001    AA386G      1999             2001              R26 | L                         
10001    AA386G      1999             2001              V55 | U
10002    CT746B       2007            2009              U38 | P
10002    CT746B       2007            2009              X48 | O
10002    CT746B       2007            2009              K93 | E
10002    RU239F       2008            2010              O28 | L
10002    RU239F       2008            2010              A47 | W
10003    TY569I         2008            2010              Q15 | P
10003    GC992M      2009            2011              W91 | O
10003    GC992M      2009            2011              Q15 | P
;

data want;
if _n_=1 then do;
 if 0 then set have;
 declare hash h();
 h.definekey(' Components');
 h.definedone();
end;


do until(last.BeginYear);
 set have;
 by  FirmID   ProductID  BeginYear notsorted;
 if first.FirmID then h.clear();
 if h.check()=0 then found=1;
 if not missing(Components) then h.replace();
end;

do until(last.BeginYear);
 set have;
 by  FirmID   ProductID  BeginYear notsorted;
 flag=ifc(found,'incremental','radical     ');
 output;
end;

run;

View solution in original post

14 REPLIES 14
Reeza
Super User

Do you have a license for SAS/OR?

PROC BOM may be helpful here. 

 

dapenDaniel
Obsidian | Level 7

I do not think I have the license for SAS/OR.

 

Is there any other way to get the result? It is unnecessary to use loop. Any code is fine as long as it can get the expected result.

PGStats
Opal | Level 21

If you don't mind SQL:

 

proc sql;
create table intro as
select 
	*,
	min(beginYear) as introYear
from have
group by firmId, components;

create table want as
select 
	firmId,
	beginYear,
	count(distinct case when beginYear > introYear then productId else "" end) as nbIncremental,
	count(distinct productId) - calculated nbIncremental as nbRadical
from intro
group by firmId, beginYear;
quit;
PG
Reeza
Super User
I think it's more complicated than counting the number of elements because of this:

"If one of the components of a new product overlaps with the existing component base, it will be considered as incremental products. For example, AA386G is an incremental product for firm 10001 because one of its components (V55 | U) already exists in its component base. So as GC992M for firm 10003."
PGStats
Opal | Level 21

Expected results for the example data would certainly help comfort my understanding of OP's question. My understanding is that if at least one of its components has been introduced before a product begins then the product is incremental; otherwise, the product is radical. That's what my query is counting.

PG
dapenDaniel
Obsidian | Level 7

Thanks for your answer. Your understanding is correct.

dapenDaniel
Obsidian | Level 7

Hi PG,

 

Thanks for your code. I have one more question.

 

When a component is first used and this component shows up more than once in the same year, I would like to compare the number in the firmID. The product with the smallest number will be considered as radical and the remainings will be considered as incremental. The format of the product ID is consistent such as AA#########B. The digits of the number are multiple.

 

For example, suppose firm 10001 have two more products (AA425T and AA427B) in 1999 and D42 | U is a new component. Because 425 is less than 427, AA425T is regarded as radical innovation while AA427B is considered as incremental innovation. 

 

FirmID   ProductID  BeginYear   MarketYear   Components                   

10001     AB259T      1996             1998              B30 | A                        

10001     AB259T      1996             1998              V55 | U                        

10001    AA386G      1999             2001              T92 | B                         

10001    AA386G      1999             2001              R26 | L                         

10001    AA386G      1999             2001              V55 | U

10001    AA425T       1999             2001              D42 | U

10001    AA427B       1999             2002              D42 | U

10002    CT746B       2007            2009              U38 | P

10002    CT746B       2007            2009              X48 | O

10002    CT746B       2007            2009              K93 | E

10002    RU239F       2008            2010              O28 | L

10002    RU239F       2008            2010              A47 | W

10003    TY569I         2008            2010              Q15 | P

10003    GC992M      2009            2011              W91 | O

10003    GC992M      2009            2011              Q15 | P

 

What should I add in the current code? Thanks!

Ksharp
Super User

Assuming I understand your question and Data has been sorted by FirmID ProductID BeginYear ;

 

data have;
input 
FirmID   ProductID $ BeginYear   MarketYear   Components & $20.   ;               
cards;
10001     AB259T      1996             1998              B30 | A                        
10001     AB259T      1996             1998              V55 | U                        
10001    AA386G      1999             2001              T92 | B                         
10001    AA386G      1999             2001              R26 | L                         
10001    AA386G      1999             2001              V55 | U
10002    CT746B       2007            2009              U38 | P
10002    CT746B       2007            2009              X48 | O
10002    CT746B       2007            2009              K93 | E
10002    RU239F       2008            2010              O28 | L
10002    RU239F       2008            2010              A47 | W
10003    TY569I         2008            2010              Q15 | P
10003    GC992M      2009            2011              W91 | O
10003    GC992M      2009            2011              Q15 | P
;

data want;
if _n_=1 then do;
 if 0 then set have;
 declare hash h();
 h.definekey(' Components');
 h.definedone();
end;


do until(last.BeginYear);
 set have;
 by  FirmID   ProductID  BeginYear notsorted;
 if first.FirmID then h.clear();
 if h.check()=0 then found=1;
 if not missing(Components) then h.replace();
end;

do until(last.BeginYear);
 set have;
 by  FirmID   ProductID  BeginYear notsorted;
 flag=ifc(found,'incremental','radical     ');
 output;
end;

run;
dapenDaniel
Obsidian | Level 7

Thanks for your reply, Ksharp!

 

Based on your code, it only shows whether the product is incremental or radical. How can I count the number of incremental or radical products for each firm in each year? Thanks.

Ksharp
Super User

Can you post the output you need ?

dapenDaniel
Obsidian | Level 7

FirmID   BeginYear   nb_Incremental   nb_Radical

10001      1996              1                            1

10001      1999              1                            1

10002      2007              0                            1

10002      2008              0                            1

10003      2008              0                            1

10003      2009              1                            0

 

nb_Incremental = number of Incremental Products

nb_Radical = number of Radical Products

 

Thank you, Ksharp!

Ksharp
Super User

I don't understand why the first obs have both Incremental   and Radical product ? since it is only have one product .

dapenDaniel
Obsidian | Level 7

Sorry, it is a typo. The number of incremental products should be 0 in 1996 for Firm 10001. The output below is the correct one.

 

FirmID   BeginYear   nb_Incremental   nb_Radical

10001      1996              0                            1

10001      1999              1                            0

10002      2007              0                            1

10002      2008              0                            1

10003      2008              0                            1

10003      2009              1                            0

 

nb_Incremental = number of Incremental Products

nb_Radical = number of Radical Products

Ksharp
Super User

Actually you could tweak my code a little bit and get what you want.

 

data have;
input 
FirmID   ProductID $ BeginYear   MarketYear   Components & $20.   ;               
cards;
10001     AB259T      1996             1998              B30 | A                        
10001     AB259T      1996             1998              V55 | U                        
10001    AA386G      1999             2001              T92 | B                         
10001    AA386G      1999             2001              R26 | L                         
10001    AA386G      1999             2001              V55 | U
10002    CT746B       2007            2009              U38 | P
10002    CT746B       2007            2009              X48 | O
10002    CT746B       2007            2009              K93 | E
10002    RU239F       2008            2010              O28 | L
10002    RU239F       2008            2010              A47 | W
10003    TY569I         2008            2010              Q15 | P
10003    GC992M      2009            2011              W91 | O
10003    GC992M      2009            2011              Q15 | P
;

data want;
if _n_=1 then do;
 if 0 then set have;
 declare hash h();
 h.definekey(' Components');
 h.definedone();
end;


do until(last.BeginYear);
 set have;
 by  FirmID   ProductID  BeginYear notsorted;
 if first.FirmID then h.clear();
 if h.check()=0 then found=1;
 if not missing(Components) then h.replace();
end;

do until(last.BeginYear);
 set have;
 by  FirmID   ProductID  BeginYear notsorted;
 flag=ifc(found,'incremental','radical     ');
 output;
end;

run;

data want2;
 set want;
 by firmid beginyear notsorted;
 if first.beginyear;
 v=1;
keep firmid beginyear flag v;
run;
proc transpose data=want2 out=want3(drop=_:);
by firmid beginyear notsorted;
id flag;
var v;
run;
proc stdize data=want3 out=want4 missing=0 reponly;
run;

SAS Innovate 2025: Register Now

Registration is now open for SAS Innovate 2025 , our biggest and most exciting global event of the year! Join us in Orlando, FL, May 6-9.
Sign up by Dec. 31 to get the 2024 rate of just $495.
Register now!

Mastering the WHERE Clause in PROC SQL

SAS' Charu Shankar shares her PROC SQL expertise by showing you how to master the WHERE clause using real winter weather data.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 14 replies
  • 1785 views
  • 0 likes
  • 4 in conversation