BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
☑ This topic is solved. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
sasstats
Fluorite | Level 6

Hello,

we have a question concerning the interpretation of the hazard ratio of a time dependent covariate.

We used the syntax of the following example of SAS

PROC PHREG: Model Using Time-Dependent Explanatory Variables :: SAS/STAT(R) 9.3 User's Guide

time = survival time, Status=1=death, Waittime = Waiting time until transplantation 

proc phreg data= Heart;
   model Time*Status(0)= XStatus XAge XScore;
   where NotTyped ^= 'y';
   if (WaitTime = . or Time < WaitTime) then do;
      XStatus=0.;
      XAge=0.;
      XScore= 0.;
   end;
   else do;
      XStatus= 1.0;
      XAge= Xpl_Age;
      XScore= Mismatch;
   end;
run;

The hazard ration for xstatus is equal 0.935.

What does this mean in case of time dependency?

Does is it mean that the risk to die is lower (-6.5%) in case of status gets one, i.e. the patients gets a transplant where the time dependence is taken into account ?

 

Best regards,

statstats

 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
FreelanceReinh
Jade | Level 19

Hello @sasstats,

 

First, note that the hazard ratio 0.935 for XStatus resulted from the model

model Time*Status(0)= XStatus Acc_Age;

The corresponding p-value 0.8261 indicates that the true hazard ratio might well be 1  (i.e., no difference in hazard rates due to XStatus; see the 95% confidence interval [0.513, 1.703]).

 

But let's assume that the model accurately describes the population, so the hazard ratio is "real." Then we would conclude that a patient with XStatus=1 (i.e., who has received a transplant) is slightly less likely to die (by a factor 0.935) than a patient

  • of the same Acc_Age
  • who has not received a transplant yet (XStatus=0)
  • in the corresponding time interval (with that hazard ratio being effective, in particular: before the second patient receives their transplant).

Or in other words: Comparing two sufficiently and equally large subpopulations "XStatus=0" vs. "XStatus=1" with the same distribution of variable Acc_Age, we might see 1000 deaths in the first group within a certain period of time and would expect only about 935 deaths in the parallel group of transplant recipients.

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
FreelanceReinh
Jade | Level 19

Hello @sasstats,

 

First, note that the hazard ratio 0.935 for XStatus resulted from the model

model Time*Status(0)= XStatus Acc_Age;

The corresponding p-value 0.8261 indicates that the true hazard ratio might well be 1  (i.e., no difference in hazard rates due to XStatus; see the 95% confidence interval [0.513, 1.703]).

 

But let's assume that the model accurately describes the population, so the hazard ratio is "real." Then we would conclude that a patient with XStatus=1 (i.e., who has received a transplant) is slightly less likely to die (by a factor 0.935) than a patient

  • of the same Acc_Age
  • who has not received a transplant yet (XStatus=0)
  • in the corresponding time interval (with that hazard ratio being effective, in particular: before the second patient receives their transplant).

Or in other words: Comparing two sufficiently and equally large subpopulations "XStatus=0" vs. "XStatus=1" with the same distribution of variable Acc_Age, we might see 1000 deaths in the first group within a certain period of time and would expect only about 935 deaths in the parallel group of transplant recipients.

sas-innovate-2024.png

Available on demand!

Missed SAS Innovate Las Vegas? Watch all the action for free! View the keynotes, general sessions and 22 breakouts on demand.

 

Register now!

What is ANOVA?

ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 1 reply
  • 298 views
  • 1 like
  • 2 in conversation