BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
🔒 This topic is solved and locked. Need further help from the community? Please sign in and ask a new question.
kennychang
Fluorite | Level 6

I am writing my graduate paper which is about drug-drug interaction and that needs to calculate the p-value. Rightnow, I have the df and the chi-squared test value. However, how can i accurately calculate the p value from E-100 to E-200.image.png

 

 

This photo clearly describes what I do right now.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
FreelanceReinh
Jade | Level 19

The purpose of the DATA step using the CARDS statement was just to create sample data to work with. Variable q contains the quantiles, i.e., the values q for which the p-value is the probability that a random variable with a chi-square distribution exceeds q. You called q "the chi-squared test value" in your initial post (if I understood correctly). Variable df contains the degrees of freedom. All these values were made up to obtain the first three p-values in your table.

 

Normally a scientific paper contains a section describing the (statistical) methods used. There I would hope to find a hint what "chi-squared test" exactly was applied to the data in your table. It was not one of the usual chi-squared tests for 2x2 tables provided by PROC FREQ. Here is an example trying to replicate the results in the last row ("Gliclazide") of your table:

/* Create input data for a 2x2 table "MI(no/yes) x Gliclazide(no/yes) under Rosiglitazone" */

data test(drop=k);
input n;
MI=mod(_n_,2);
k=dif(n);
if ~MI then n=k;
Glic=_n_>2;
cards;
19971
62409
34 
655
;

/* Create 2x2 table, perform chi-square tests and compute odds ratio */

ods exclude FishersExact;
ods output chisq=cs;
proc freq data=test;
weight n;
tables MI*Glic / chisq or;
run;

/* Print p-values with greater precision */

proc print data=cs(obs=4);
format prob best12.;
run;

PROC FREQ output (0=no, 1=yes for variables MI and Glic):

Table of MI by Glic

MI        Glic

Frequency|
Percent  |
Row Pct  |
Col Pct  |       0|       1|  Total
---------+--------+--------+
       0 |  42438 |    621 |  43059
         |  67.29 |   0.98 |  68.28
         |  98.56 |   1.44 |
         |  68.00 |  94.81 |
---------+--------+--------+
       1 |  19971 |     34 |  20005
         |  31.67 |   0.05 |  31.72
         |  99.83 |   0.17 |
         |  32.00 |   5.19 |
---------+--------+--------+
Total       62409      655    63064
            98.96     1.04   100.00


Statistics for Table of MI by Glic

Statistic                     DF       Value      Prob
------------------------------------------------------
Chi-Square                     1    215.0999    <.0001
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square    1    286.8605    <.0001
Continuity Adj. Chi-Square     1    213.8639    <.0001
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square     1    215.0965    <.0001
Phi Coefficient                      -0.0584
Contingency Coefficient               0.0583
Cramer's V                           -0.0584


                  Odds Ratio and Relative Risks

Statistic                        Value       95% Confidence Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------
Odds Ratio                      0.1163        0.0823        0.1644
Relative Risk (Column 1)        0.9873        0.9860        0.9885
Relative Risk (Column 2)        8.4857        6.0109       11.9793

Sample Size = 63064

PROC PRINT output:

Obs         Table         Statistic                      DF         Value            Prob

 1     Table MI * Glic    Chi-Square                      1      215.0999    1.059926E-48
 2     Table MI * Glic    Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square     1      286.8605    2.402392E-64
 3     Table MI * Glic    Continuity Adj. Chi-Square      1      213.8639    1.972021E-48
 4     Table MI * Glic    Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square      1      215.0965    1.061743E-48

As you can see, the point and interval estimates of the odds ratio match the rounded values "0.12 (0.08-0.16)" in your table, but none of the four chi-square p-values would be rounded to 3.1E-34.

 


@kennychang wrote:
How can i get the SAS?

Do you mean how to get access to SAS software? I think SAS® OnDemand for Academics would be ideal for you.

View solution in original post

5 REPLIES 5
FreelanceReinh
Jade | Level 19

Hello @kennychang and welcome to the SAS Support Communities!

 

I'm curious as to how the p-values in your table are defined because they don't seem to match any of those produced by PROC FREQ (with the CHISQ option of the TABLES statement), applied to the 2x2 tables the odds ratios have been calculated for.

 

That said, if you have the quantiles and degrees of freedom (none of which is shown in your table), you can use the SDF function to compute the p-values. (Or do you question the accuracy of the SDF function for large quantiles?)

 

Example:

data have;
input q df;
cards;
923.67 1
705.61 2
548.09 3
;

data want;
set have;
p=sdf('chisq',q,df);
run;

proc print data=want;
format p e8.;
run;

Result:

Obs       q      df           p

 1     923.67     1    7.0E-203
 2     705.61     2    6.0E-154
 3     548.09     3    1.8E-118

 

kennychang
Fluorite | Level 6
Thanks a lot. I would like to know the meaning of q? Does it equal to confidence level? (maybe it =0.05?), i am also curious for that as the paper wasn't written by me.

How can i get the SAS?
ALSO, i want to ask what does it mean?
cards;
923.67 1
705.61 2
548.09 3

And the example is the code that can automatically to compute the p values? (by input my data)
for examples:
the patient having pioglitazone with bladder cancer : 50
the patient having pioglitazone with other ADRs : 5194
the patient not having pioglitazone with bladder cancer : 9372
the patient not having pioglitazone with other ADRS: 40815
and the degree of freedom is 1

SORRY for having many questions ! I am a freshman in data-analysis my professor never teach me anything
FreelanceReinh
Jade | Level 19

The purpose of the DATA step using the CARDS statement was just to create sample data to work with. Variable q contains the quantiles, i.e., the values q for which the p-value is the probability that a random variable with a chi-square distribution exceeds q. You called q "the chi-squared test value" in your initial post (if I understood correctly). Variable df contains the degrees of freedom. All these values were made up to obtain the first three p-values in your table.

 

Normally a scientific paper contains a section describing the (statistical) methods used. There I would hope to find a hint what "chi-squared test" exactly was applied to the data in your table. It was not one of the usual chi-squared tests for 2x2 tables provided by PROC FREQ. Here is an example trying to replicate the results in the last row ("Gliclazide") of your table:

/* Create input data for a 2x2 table "MI(no/yes) x Gliclazide(no/yes) under Rosiglitazone" */

data test(drop=k);
input n;
MI=mod(_n_,2);
k=dif(n);
if ~MI then n=k;
Glic=_n_>2;
cards;
19971
62409
34 
655
;

/* Create 2x2 table, perform chi-square tests and compute odds ratio */

ods exclude FishersExact;
ods output chisq=cs;
proc freq data=test;
weight n;
tables MI*Glic / chisq or;
run;

/* Print p-values with greater precision */

proc print data=cs(obs=4);
format prob best12.;
run;

PROC FREQ output (0=no, 1=yes for variables MI and Glic):

Table of MI by Glic

MI        Glic

Frequency|
Percent  |
Row Pct  |
Col Pct  |       0|       1|  Total
---------+--------+--------+
       0 |  42438 |    621 |  43059
         |  67.29 |   0.98 |  68.28
         |  98.56 |   1.44 |
         |  68.00 |  94.81 |
---------+--------+--------+
       1 |  19971 |     34 |  20005
         |  31.67 |   0.05 |  31.72
         |  99.83 |   0.17 |
         |  32.00 |   5.19 |
---------+--------+--------+
Total       62409      655    63064
            98.96     1.04   100.00


Statistics for Table of MI by Glic

Statistic                     DF       Value      Prob
------------------------------------------------------
Chi-Square                     1    215.0999    <.0001
Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square    1    286.8605    <.0001
Continuity Adj. Chi-Square     1    213.8639    <.0001
Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square     1    215.0965    <.0001
Phi Coefficient                      -0.0584
Contingency Coefficient               0.0583
Cramer's V                           -0.0584


                  Odds Ratio and Relative Risks

Statistic                        Value       95% Confidence Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------
Odds Ratio                      0.1163        0.0823        0.1644
Relative Risk (Column 1)        0.9873        0.9860        0.9885
Relative Risk (Column 2)        8.4857        6.0109       11.9793

Sample Size = 63064

PROC PRINT output:

Obs         Table         Statistic                      DF         Value            Prob

 1     Table MI * Glic    Chi-Square                      1      215.0999    1.059926E-48
 2     Table MI * Glic    Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square     1      286.8605    2.402392E-64
 3     Table MI * Glic    Continuity Adj. Chi-Square      1      213.8639    1.972021E-48
 4     Table MI * Glic    Mantel-Haenszel Chi-Square      1      215.0965    1.061743E-48

As you can see, the point and interval estimates of the odds ratio match the rounded values "0.12 (0.08-0.16)" in your table, but none of the four chi-square p-values would be rounded to 3.1E-34.

 


@kennychang wrote:
How can i get the SAS?

Do you mean how to get access to SAS software? I think SAS® OnDemand for Academics would be ideal for you.

kennychang
Fluorite | Level 6
i agree with you, the p-values should be 1.09E-48. Right now i can use the SAS to calculate the p-value in stead of using excel.
kennychang
Fluorite | Level 6
THANKS A LOT!!!!

SAS Innovate 2025: Save the Date

 SAS Innovate 2025 is scheduled for May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. Sign up to be first to learn about the agenda and registration!

Save the date!

What is ANOVA?

ANOVA, or Analysis Of Variance, is used to compare the averages or means of two or more populations to better understand how they differ. Watch this tutorial for more.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Discussion stats
  • 5 replies
  • 808 views
  • 2 likes
  • 2 in conversation