Hello,
I'm using PROC GEE to analyze a multinomial generalized logit model (4-category outcome = 3 logit models). I am running LSMeans to get all pairwise differences with an adjustment for multiple comparisons. I notice that the adjustments are made viewing the 3 logit models separately rather than jointly as a system; thus the adjustment is lot smaller than I expected. For example, if I have 6 pairwise comparisons per logit model and 3 logit models, I have a total of 18 pairwise comparisons. I figured the adjustment would be for 18 comparisons, but the adjustment only seems to be for 6 comparisons. For example, if using Bonferroni*, adjusted p-value = p-value * 6, rather than p-value * 18.
Is this ok to do? Can the 3 logit models really be viewed independently so I don't have to adjust for comparisons made in the other models?
This difference can be seen using LSMEstimate and coding all pairwise comparisons. If I use category = joint, I get the expected adjustment for 18 comparisons, but if I use category = separate, then I get the same results as LSMeans, adjusted for only 6 comparisons.
(* Note, I am not actually using Bonferroni, but it was the easiest to use as an example.)
Warm regards,
Michael
proc gee data = cogFunc._07_Model descending;
class ID outcomeClassN exposureC (ref = '1 = Low');
model outcomeClassN = exposureC / dist = multinomial link = gLogit type3 wald;
repeated subject = ID;
lsMeans exposureC / diff adjust = bon;
lsmEstimate exposureC 'Very high vs. Low' 0 0 1 -1,
'High vs. Low' 0 1 0 -1,
'Intermediate vs. Low' 1 0 0 -1,
'Very high vs. Intermediate' -1 0 1 0,
'High vs. Intermediate' -1 1 0 0,
'Very high vs. High' 0 -1 1 0
/ category = joint adjust = bon;
run;