Validating an ID Number

[NOMBUH]

Good Day

Please assist with a code to validate the first 6 digit of an SA ID Number(YYMMDD).

Thank you

[andreas_lds]

I don't know what a "SA ID Number" is, so please post an excerpt of the data you have and what you except as result.

[ed_sas_member]

Hi @NOMBUH 

Do you refer to the South African ID number?

If yes, as the first 6 digits (YYMMDD) are based on the date of birth, which level of validation do you want?

- exact date: do you have a dataset containing the date of birth of someone and its SA ID number?

- "plausible" date: do you want to test if YMMDD could be a date? (eg. MM -> 01 to 12), ...?

Please provide more details.

[ErikLund_Jensen]

Hi @NOMBUH 

A simple way to check for a valid date is to see if the string can be converted to a valid sas date with an input function.

Note ?? in the following example. It is a format modifier, so the input function does not treat an invalid date as an error, but returns a missing value.

code:

data have;
	SA_ID = '3333331234'; output;
	SA_ID = '1313131234'; output;
	SA_ID = '1212121234'; output;
	SA_ID = '1901271234'; output;	
run;

data want; set have;
	Valid = (input(substr(SA_ID,1,6),??yymmdd6.) ne .);
run;

result:

[ballardw]

The data step code could be reduced to:

data want; 
	set have;
	Valid = (input(SA_ID,??yymmdd6.) ne .);
run;

A specified length on the informat only reads that many characters so the substr shouldn't be needed.

[ErikLund_Jensen]

Hi @ballardw 

Yes, of course. It is always good practice to avoid unnecessary functions, and the substr function is "overdoing things". I often do that, and I checked a couple of programs.

I found this construct: ThisSSN = strip(scan(RelationList,i,',')) - I know that RelationList is always a list of social security numbers, They will never contain embedded blanks or other default delimiters, so in this case scanning by belimiter and stripping is unnecessary. ThisSSN = scan(RelationList,i) would give the same result.

We all have a set of ingrown habits, when it comes to coding, and I wonder how much effort should be put in the final optimization of a program. it certainly makes the code more readable, but does it matter in terms of computing time? I made a test just for fun to see the impact of removing the substring function in the valid-check, and it does make a difference, about 10%:

45    data _null_;
46        set have;
47        *Valid = (input(SA_ID,??yymmdd6.) ne .);
48        Valid = (input(substr(SA_ID,1,6),??yymmdd6.) ne .);
49    run;

NOTE: There were 50000000 observations read from the data set WORK.HAVE.
NOTE: DATA statement used (Total process time):
      real time           6.53 seconds
      cpu time            6.54 seconds


50    data _null_;
51        set have;
52        Valid = (input(SA_ID,??yymmdd6.) ne .);
53        *Valid = (input(substr(SA_ID,1,6),??yymmdd6.) ne .);
54    run;

NOTE: There were 50000000 observations read from the data set WORK.HAVE.
NOTE: DATA statement used (Total process time):
      real time           6.06 seconds
      cpu time            5.97 seconds

I wish you a good weekend

Erik