Trying to export csv, unexpected carriage return

[marmst10]

This is the first few rows of my data

0002	C	00001	IV	R1	2	025VS	1111111	1	1	1				0	.	C
0002	C	00001	IV	R3	2	053VS	1111111	1	1	1				0	.	C
0002	C	00001	LG	R1	2	5408V	1111111	1	1	1				0	.	C
0002	B	00001	UB	DS	2	126PD	1111111	1	1	1				0	.	C
0002	C	00001	UB	DS	2	126PD	1111111	1	1	1				0	.	C
0002	B	00001	UB	DS	2	465PD	1111111	1	1	1				0	.	C
0002	C	00001	UB	DS	2	465PD	1111111	1	1	12				0	.	C
0002	C	00001	UB	DS	2	670PD	1111111	1	1	1				0	.	C
0002	B	00001	UB	DS	2	678PD	1111111	1	1	1				0	.	C
0002	C	00001	UB	DS	2	678PD	1111111	1	1	3				0	.	C
0002	B	00001	UB	DS	2	G5012	1111111	1	1	6				0	.	C

This is my code for the export

proc export data = class.merged_n /*Export merged_n as a csv*/
outfile = 'C:\...\merged_n.csv'
dbms = csv
replace;
run;

This is the output, from notepad. Opening in excel it says "File not loaded completely"

0002,C,00001,IV,R1,2,025VS,1111111
1,1,,,,0,,C
0002,C,00001,IV,R3,2,053VS,1111111
1,1,,,,0,,C
0002,C,00001,LG,R1,2,5408V,1111111
1,1,,,,0,,C
0002,B,00001,UB,DS,2,126PD,1111111
1,1,,,,0,,C
0002,C,00001,UB,DS,2,126PD,1111111
1,1,,,,0,,C
0002,B,00001,UB,DS,2,465PD,1111111
1,1,,,,0,,C
0002,C,00001,UB,DS,2,465PD,1111111
1,12,,,,0,,C
0002,C,00001,UB,DS,2,670PD,1111111
1,1,,,,0,,C
0002,B,00001,UB,DS,2,678PD,1111111
1,1,,,,0,,C
0002,C,00001,UB,DS,2,678PD,1111111
1,3,,,,0,,C
0002,B,00001,UB,DS,2,G5012,1111111
1,6,,,,0,,C
0002,C,00001,UB,DS,2,G5012,1111111
1,45,,,,0,,C

You can see the unexpected carriage returns. How to remedy this?

Thanks in advance

[Reeza]

file not loaded in Excel may be due to the size of the file, Excel 2007 and prior (32 bit) has a 64K row limit and Excel 2010+ has a 1 million row limit.

You can use COMPRESS() and the carriage return ('0A'x I believe) to remove the character from your data.

[Tom]

PROC EXPORT is not going to insert any extra line breaks.  If there are LineFeeds ('0A'x) or CarrriageReturns ('0D'x) in the output then they are in the input.

Are you sure the data you posted are the same?  The first appears to have more variables than the second.  In particular look at the first observation of each. Notice how there are three cells in a row with '1' in them in the table you posted.  But in the text you posted the first two lines have only one cell with '1' in it.