BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
Ksharp
Super User

It looks like you are creating dynamic code.

As my experience, CALL EXECUTE is the best choice.

Ksharp

ZRick
Obsidian | Level 7

would you mind illustrating little bit?

Ksharp
Super User

For the Linlin's example .

data temp;
input tname $40. ;
cards;
sashelp.class
sashelp.cars
;
run;
data _null_;
 set temp;
 call execute(catx(' ','data',scan(tname,-1,'.'),'; set',tname,';run; proc print;run;'));
run;

Ksharp

Astounding
PROC Star

ZRick,

I can't help but wonder if we're approaching this problem the right way.  There's an earlier step that generates all these lines of SAS code.  Now we're looking to reorganize them and run them.  Would it make sense to break into the earlier step instead?  Right now it generates several streams of SAS statements.  Would it make more sense for the earlier step to generate stream1.sas with all the cat=1 lines, stream2.sas with all the cat=2 lines, etc.?  You would have ready-to-run programs holding all the proper statements.

Just a thought.

Ready to join fellow brilliant minds for the SAS Hackathon?

Build your skills. Make connections. Enjoy creative freedom. Maybe change the world. Registration is now open through August 30th. Visit the SAS Hackathon homepage.

Register today!
How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 18 replies
  • 1642 views
  • 8 likes
  • 7 in conversation