BookmarkSubscribeRSS Feed
jennxxness
Calcite | Level 5

Hi Everyone,

I am running a cause specific hazards regression model and my model currently violates the proportional hazards assumption for my independent variable "case" (checked by both looking at Schoenfeld residuals and the supremum test)

proc phreg data=work.MACE covs(aggregate);
class case (ref='0') income (ref='1') rurality (ref='0');
model time*event (0,2) = case income rurality/ RL ties=efron;
id patientgroup;
run;

My understanding for when the PH assumption is violated, is that I can choose to add a time interaction term for my variable case, to understand where the hazard ratio deviates/changes.

I have seen papers that graphically demonstrate how the adjusted hazard ratio changes as a function of time.

 

Does anyone have any advice on how I can demonstrate and program this?

 

Thank you!

 

1 REPLY 1
JOL
SAS Employee JOL
SAS Employee

Try re-posting under menu --> Analytics -> Statistical Procedures

Ready to join fellow brilliant minds for the SAS Hackathon?

Build your skills. Make connections. Enjoy creative freedom. Maybe change the world. Registration is now open through August 30th. Visit the SAS Hackathon homepage.

Register today!
How to Concatenate Values

Learn how use the CAT functions in SAS to join values from multiple variables into a single value.

Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.

Click image to register for webinarClick image to register for webinar

Classroom Training Available!

Select SAS Training centers are offering in-person courses. View upcoming courses for:

View all other training opportunities.

Discussion stats
  • 1 reply
  • 366 views
  • 0 likes
  • 2 in conversation