Hi,
I have categorical variables in the logistic regression and I'd like to label their values in output, so instead of having 1,2,3 etc. I'd like to have names of ethnic groups. Is there a way to do that?
Thank you!
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates | ||||||
Parameter | DF | Estimate | Standard | Wald | Pr > ChiSq | |
Error | Chi-Square | |||||
Intercept | 1 | -30.9965 | 220.3 | 0.0198 | 0.8881 | |
race | 1 | 1 | 13.295 | 186.4 | 0.0051 | 0.9431 |
race | 2 | 1 | -3.7821 | 392.2 | 0.0001 | 0.9923 |
race | 3 | 1 | -2.33 | 514.4 | 0 | 0.9964 |
race | 4 | 1 | -2.1724 | 472.6 | 0 | 0.9963 |
race | 5 | 1 | -1.5253 | 725.1 | 0 | 0.9983 |
race | 6 | 1 | -1.9817 | 580.2 | 0 | 0.9973 |
Use a format, something like this:
proc format;
value $racef. '1'='Martian' '2'='Venusian' '3'='Earthling';
run;
proc logistic data=whatever;
...
format race $racef.;
run;
Use a format, something like this:
proc format;
value $racef. '1'='Martian' '2'='Venusian' '3'='Earthling';
run;
proc logistic data=whatever;
...
format race $racef.;
run;
Great! Thank you very much!
Correcting a typographical error — no dot after $racef in PROC FORMAT
proc format;
value $racef '1'='Martian' '2'='Venusian' '3'='Earthling';
run;
proc logistic data=whatever;
...
format race $racef.;
run;
Sorry for more trouble, but I have a follow up question. Format worked just fine, in terms of formatting the output. The problem is that when I run the code with format it drops some estimates. Is there a reason why it's doing it?
Here is output without format:
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates | ||||||
Parameter | DF | Estimate | Standard | Wald | Pr > ChiSq | |
Error | Chi-Square | |||||
Intercept | 1 | -30.9965 | 220.3 | 0.0198 | 0.8881 | |
race | 1 | 1 | 13.295 | 186.4 | 0.0051 | 0.9431 |
race | 2 | 1 | -3.7821 | 392.2 | 0.0001 | 0.9923 |
race | 3 | 1 | -2.33 | 514.4 | 0 | 0.9964 |
race | 4 | 1 | -2.1724 | 472.6 | 0 | 0.9963 |
race | 5 | 1 | -1.5253 | 725.1 | 0 | 0.9983 |
race | 6 | 1 | -1.9817 | 580.2 | 0 | 0.9973 |
race | 7 | 1 | -2.2975 | 576.2 | 0 | 0.9968 |
race | 8 | 1 | -1.4041 | 709.9 | 0 | 0.9984 |
race | 9 | 1 | -2.2255 | 849 | 0 | 0.9979 |
race | 10 | 1 | -2.6247 | 567.1 | 0 | 0.9963 |
race | 11 | 1 | -3.034 | 1310.9 | 0 | 0.9982 |
race | 12 | 1 | 13.7587 | 186.4 | 0.0054 | 0.9412 |
And here is the output when I add format:
Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates | ||||||
Parameter | DF | Estimate | Standard | Wald | Pr > ChiSq | |
Error | Chi-Square | |||||
Intercept | 1 | -30.2701 | 918.8 | 0.0011 | 0.9737 | |
race | Aboriginal | 1 | 13.5539 | 115.8 | 0.0137 | 0.9068 |
race | Arab | 1 | -2.1409 | 416.6 | 0 | 0.9959 |
race | Black | 1 | -2.2589 | 382.7 | 0 | 0.9953 |
race | Chinese | 0 | 0 | . | . | . |
race | Filipino | 0 | 0 | . | . | . |
race | Japanese | 0 | 0 | . | . | . |
race | Korean | 0 | 0 | . | . | . |
race | Latin American | 0 | 0 | . | . | . |
race | Other | 1 | -2.7809 | 271.4 | 0.0001 | 0.9918 |
race | South Asian | 1 | -3.7314 | 300.6 | 0.0002 | 0.9901 |
race | Southeast Asian | 0 | 0 | . | . | . |
race | West Asian | 0 | 0 | . | . | . |
thank you,
i.
We need to see the code you used, and (a portion of) the RAW data.
Are you ready for the spotlight? We're accepting content ideas for SAS Innovate 2025 to be held May 6-9 in Orlando, FL. The call is open until September 25. Read more here about why you should contribute and what is in it for you!
Learn the difference between classical and Bayesian statistical approaches and see a few PROC examples to perform Bayesian analysis in this video.
Find more tutorials on the SAS Users YouTube channel.